RECOMMENDATIONS FOR USE AND SCORING OF ORAL HEALTH IMPACT PROFILE VERSIONS.

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR USE AND SCORING OF ORAL HEALTH IMPACT PROFILE VERSIONS.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.jebdp.2021.101619
复制
发表时间:
2022-03
期刊:
The journal of evidence-based dental practice
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Larsson P
Larsson P
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
John MT;Omara M;Su N;List T;Sekulic S;Häggman-Henrikson B;Visscher CM;Bekes K;Reissmann DR;Baba K;Schierz O;Theis-Mahon N;Fueki K;Stamm T;Bondemark L;Oghli I;van Wijk A;Larsson P

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

OHIP最初的七个领域的结构并不符合经验数据,但心理测量的声音和临床上更合理的结构与四个OHRQoL维度口腔功能,口面疼痛,口面外观,心理社会影响已经出现。因此,需要重新审视现有OHIP版本的使用和评分。我们评估了整体结构OHRQoL及其四个维度的测量与几个OHIP版本(20,19,14和5项),以获得建议,应使用哪些工具,以及如何评分。数据来自“OHRQoL项目的维度”,并使用该项目的学习样本(5,173名口腔修复患者和普通人群受试者,具有49项OHIP数据)。我们计算了OHIP版本的汇总评分之间的相关性。OHRQoL维度之间的相关性,一方面,和OHIP版本的领域得分或OHIP-5的项目,另一方面,也进行了计算。OHIP的使用和评分建议,心理测量固体,但也实用OHRQoL评估。5、14、19和49项版本的总分高度相关(r= 0.91-0.98),表明不同版本的OHRQoL结构测量结果相似。OHRQoL维度口腔功能、口面疼痛、口面外观和心理社会影响分别通过OHIP领域的身体残疾、身体疼痛、心理不适和残疾评分进行最佳测量。得出的建议,OHIP应优先使用和OHIP版本应如何评分,以捕捉整体结构和尺寸的OHRQoL。在所有口腔健康状况的所有环境中,心理测量学上可靠和实用的OHRQoL评估可以通过5项OHIP实现。
OHIP’s original seven-domain structure does not fit empirical data, but a psychometrically sound and clinically more plausible structure with the four OHRQoL dimensions Oral Function, Orofacial Pain, Orofacial Appearance, and Psychosocial Impact has emerged. Consequently, use and scoring of available OHIP versions needs to be revisited. We assessed how well the overall construct OHRQoL and its four dimensions were measured with several OHIP versions (20, 19, 14, and 5 items) to derive recommendations which instruments should be used and how to score them. Data came from the “Dimensions of OHRQoL Project” and used the project’s learning sample (5,173 prosthodontic patients and general population subjects with 49-item OHIPs data). We computed correlations among OHIP versions’ summary scores. Correlations between OHRQoL dimensions, on one hand, and OHIP versions’ domain scores or OHIP-5’s items, on the other hand, were also computed. OHIP use and scoring recommendation were derived for psychometric solid but also practical OHRQoL assessment. Summary scores of 5-, 14-, 19- and 49-item versions correlated highly (r= 0.91–0.98), suggesting similar OHRQoL construct measurement across versions. The OHRQoL dimensions Oral Function, Orofacial Pain, Orofacial Appearance, and Psychosocial Impact were best measured by the OHIP domain scores for Physical Disability, Physical Pain, Psychological Discomfort, and Handicap, respectively. Recommendations were derived which OHIP should be preferably used and how OHIP versions should be scored to capture the overall construct and the dimensions of OHRQoL. Psychometrically solid and practical OHRQoL assessment in all settings across all oral health conditions can be achieved with the 5-item OHIP.
DOI: 10.1111/joor.12192
发表时间: 2014-09
影响因子: 2.9
作者:
John MT;Reissmann DR;Feuerstahler L;Waller N;Baba K;Larsson P;Celebić A;Szabo G;Rener-Sitar K
通讯作者: Rener-Sitar K
DOI: 10.1177/154405910708600804
发表时间: 2007-08-01
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
Baker, S. R.
通讯作者: Baker, S. R.
DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-24
发表时间: 2010-02-21
影响因子: 3.6
作者:
Montero, Javier;Bravo, Manuel;Albaladejo, Alberto
通讯作者: Albaladejo, Alberto
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2007.00514.x
发表时间: 2007-03-01
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
Mumcu, G.;Hayran, O.;Direskeneli, H.
通讯作者: Direskeneli, H.
DOI: 10.1111/joor.12137
发表时间: 2014-04-01
影响因子: 2.9
作者:
Larsson, P.;John, M. T.;List, T.
通讯作者: List, T.