The social-safety system: Fortifying relationships in the face of the unforeseeable.
The social-safety system: Fortifying relationships in the face of the unforeseeable.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/pspi0000245
复制
发表时间：
2021-01
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Brinkman C
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Murray SL;Lamarche V;Seery MD;Jung HY;Griffin DW;Brinkman C
社会安全系统的一个模型，提出了解释人们如何维持在关系世界中的安全感时，他们无法预见他人的行为。在这个模型中，人们可以逃避在他们的个人关系世界中行为出乎意料的代理人所带来的急性焦虑（例如，配偶，孩子）通过防御性地将善意的动机强加给控制他们的社会政治关系世界的代理人（例如，总统，国会）。相反，人们可以通过防御性地将善意的动机强加给控制他们个人关系世界的代理人，来逃避社会政治代理人的意外行为所带来的急性焦虑。两项每日日记研究，一项关于2018年中期选举的纵向研究，以及一项为期3年的新婚夫妇纵向研究支持了这一假设。在日常生活中，那些不太确定自己是否可以信任自己的浪漫伴侣的人，通过肯定对另一个世界中代理人善意动机的信念，来抵御一个关系世界中严重不可预见的行为。此外，当人们在面对意想不到的事情时，更多的是在交替的关系世界中寻找安全感的个人日常习惯时，那些最初不确定他们是否可以信任他们的浪漫伴侣的人后来证明了他们的个人关系伴侣更大的舒适度。
A model of the social-safety system is proposed to explain how people sustain a sense of safety in the relational world when they are not able to foresee the behavior of others. In this model, people can escape the acute anxiety posed by agents in their personal relational world behaving unexpectedly (e.g., spouse, child) by defensively imposing well-intentioned motivations on the agents controlling their sociopolitical relational world (e.g., President, Congress). Conversely, people can escape the acute anxiety posed by sociopolitical agents behaving unexpectedly by defensively imposing well-intentioned motivations on the agents controlling their personal relational world. Two daily diary studies, a longitudinal study of the 2018 midterm election, and a 3-year longitudinal study of newlyweds supported the hypotheses. On a daily basis, people who were less certain they could trust their romantic partner defended against acutely unforeseeable behavior in one relational world by affirming faith in the well-intentioned motivations of agents in the alternate world. Moreover, when people were more in the personal daily habit of finding safety in the alternate relational world in the face of the unexpected, those who were initially uncertain they could trust their romantic partner later evidenced greater comfort depending on their personal relationship partners.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
6.1
作者：
Bloom, Nicholas
通讯作者：
Bloom, Nicholas
影响因子：
8.2
作者：
Beall, Alec T.;Hofer, Marlise K.;Schaller, Mark
通讯作者：
Schaller, Mark
影响因子：
8.4
作者：
Bloom, Nicholas
通讯作者：
Bloom, Nicholas
影响因子：
2
作者：
Castelnuovo, Efrem;Trung Duc Tran
通讯作者：
Trung Duc Tran
影响因子：
1.6
作者：
Derrick, Jaye L.;Leonard, Kenneth E.;Homish, Gregory G.
通讯作者：
Homish, Gregory G.