Reliability but not bias: Developing a scale to measure preferred channels for risk information during the COVID pandemic

Reliability but not bias: Developing a scale to measure preferred channels for risk information during the COVID pandemic
复制标题

可靠性而非偏见:制定衡量新冠疫情期间风险信息首选渠道的量表

DOI:
10.1111/risa.14035
复制
发表时间:
2022
期刊:
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Gilbert, Christine
Gilbert, Christine
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lachlan, Kenneth A.;Gilbert, Christine

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

为了开发一种新的衡量风险信息首选来源的方法,两项研究要求受访者指出他们依赖哪些渠道获得有关COVID-19的信息,这些渠道来自25个政治领域的新闻渠道。出乎意料的是,依赖性集中在可靠性水平上,而不是新闻频道的政治取向上。换句话说,每个集群都包括来自政治光谱左侧和右侧的媒体渠道,而依赖性则聚集在不同的来源中,这些来源的内容可靠程度不同。转向较低可靠性渠道的参与者表示风险感知较低,概率估计不太准确,疫苗接种意愿降低,保护性行为意愿降低。那些倾向于使用更高的可靠性渠道表示更高的风险认知,更准确的概率估计,增加疫苗接种的意图,更高的保护性行为的意图。这些关系进行了讨论的影响,我们的理解来源的依赖和风险认知,信息的充分性,以及对未来的研究和公共卫生干预措施的影响。
To develop a new measure of preferred sources for risk information, two studies asked respondents to indicate what channels they were reliant on for information about COVID‐19, from 25 news channels ranging across the political spectrum. Unexpectedly, dependencies clustered around level of reliability rather than the political orientation of the news channel. In other words, each cluster included media channels from both the left and right side of the political spectrum, while dependencies clustered into sources that varied by the degree to which their content is reliable. Participants who turned to lower reliability channels indicated lower risk perceptions, less accurate probability estimations, reduced vaccination intentions, and lower protective behavioral intentions. Those inclined to use higher reliability channels indicated higher risk perceptions, more accurate probability estimations, increased vaccination intentions, and higher protective behavioral intentions. These relationships are discussed in terms of implications for our understanding of source reliance and risk perception, information sufficiency, and implications for both future research and public health interventions.
与临床试验注册相关的信息检索
DOI: 10.1177/0093650210380411
发表时间: 2011
影响因子: 6.2
作者:
Z. J. Yang;K. McComas;Geri Gay;J. Leonard;A. Dannenberg;Hildy Dillon
通讯作者: Hildy Dillon
DOI: 10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629
发表时间: 2020-02-10
影响因子: 11.4
作者:
Hayes, Andrew F.;Coutts, Jacob J.
通讯作者: Coutts, Jacob J.
媒体效果、选择性曝光和华氏度 9/11
DOI: --
发表时间: 2007
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
N. Stroud
通讯作者: N. Stroud
受污染食品召回新闻的第三人称效应:检验台湾大学生的可信度、关注度和阐述的作用
DOI: --
发表时间: 2010
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
R. Wei;V. Lo;Hung
通讯作者: Hung
DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2018.1437524
发表时间: 2019-07-03
影响因子: 3.9
作者:
Kilgo, Danielle K.;Yoo, Joseph;Johnson, Thomas J.
通讯作者: Johnson, Thomas J.