Evaluating Effects of Enhanced Autonomy Transparency on Trust, Dependence, and Human-Autonomy Team Performance over Time
Evaluating Effects of Enhanced Autonomy Transparency on Trust, Dependence, and Human-Autonomy Team Performance over Time
复制标题
随着时间的推移,评估增强的自主透明度对信任、依赖和人类自主团队绩效的影响
DOI:
10.1080/10447318.2022.2097602
复制
发表时间:
2022
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Yang, X. Jessie
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Luo, Ruikun;Du, Na;Yang, X. Jessie
As autonomous systems become more complicated, humans may have difficulty deciphering autonomy-generated solutions and increasingly perceive autonomy as a mysterious black box. The lack of transparency contributes to the lack of trust in autonomy and suboptimal team performance. In response to this concern, researchers have proposed various methods to enhance autonomy transparency and evaluated how enhanced transparency could affect the people’s trust and the human-autonomy team performance. However, the majority of prior studies measured trust at the end of the experiment and averaged behavioral and performance measures across all trials in an experiment, yet overlooked the temporal dynamics of those variables. We have little understanding of how autonomy transparency affects trust, dependence, and performanceover time. The present study, therefore, aims to fill the gap and examine such temporal dynamics. We develop a gameTreasure Hunterwherein a human uncovers a map for treasures with the help from an intelligent assistant. The intelligent assistant recommends where the human should go next. The rationale behind each recommendation could be conveyed in a display that explicitly lists the option space (i.e., all the possible actions) and the reason why a particular action is the most appropriate in a given context. Results from a human-in-the-loop experiment with 28 participants indicate that by conveying the intelligent assistant’s decision-making rationale via the display, participants’ trust increases significantly and becomes more calibrated over time. Using the display also leads to a higher acceptance of recommendations from the intelligent agent.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1007/978-3-319-07458-0
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
Stelzer;Steindecker
通讯作者:
Steindecker
DOI:
10.1177/1064804615611274
发表时间:
2016
期刊:
Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications
影响因子:
--
作者:
J. Lyons;N. Ho;Kolina S. Koltai;Gina Masequesmay;M. Skoog;Artemio Cacanindin;W. Johnson
通讯作者:
W. Johnson
影响因子:
5.2
作者:
C. Miller
通讯作者:
C. Miller
DOI:
10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00038-7
发表时间:
2003-06-01
影响因子:
5.4
作者:
Dzindolet, MT;Peterson, SA;Beck, HP
通讯作者:
Beck, HP
DOI:
10.1177/1541931213601031
发表时间:
2016
期刊:
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
影响因子:
--
作者:
James C. Walliser;Ewart J. de Visser;Tyler H. Shaw
通讯作者:
Tyler H. Shaw