Chinese Children's Moral Evaluation of Lies and Truths-Roles of Context and Parental Individualism-Collectivism Tendencies.

Chinese Children's Moral Evaluation of Lies and Truths-Roles of Context and Parental Individualism-Collectivism Tendencies.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1002/icd.680
复制
发表时间:
2010-10
影响因子:
2.2
通讯作者:
Lee, Kang
Lee, Kang
中科院分区:
心理学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fu, Genyue;Brunet, Megan K.;Lv, Yin;Ding, Xiaopan;Heyman, Gail D.;Cameron, Catherine Ann;Lee, Kang

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本研究考察了中国儿童对自己的亲社会行为的真相和谎言的道德评价。 7岁、9岁和11岁的孩子会读一些小插曲,其中主角做了一件好事,老师在全班面前或私下询问这件事。作为回应,主角要么说了一个中国文化高度重视的谦虚的谎言,要么说了一个不谦虚的真相,这违反了中国关于谦虚的文化规范。孩子们被要求辨别主角的陈述是真还是假,并评估该陈述的“好”或“坏”程度。中国孩子对谦虚的谎言的评价比不谦虚的真理更积极,随着年龄的增长,这种影响变得更加明显。中国农村的孩子和那些至少有一位非专业父母的孩子,在公开场合而不是在私下里被告知不谦虚的事实时,他们对这些事情的评价不那么积极。此外,集体主义得分高的父母的中国孩子比集体主义得分低的父母的孩子更看重适度的谎言。这些发现表明,宏观和微观文化因素对儿童对真话和说谎的道德理解都有显着贡献。
The present study examined Chinese children’s moral evaluations of truths and lies about one’s own pro-social acts. Children ages 7, 9, and 11 were read vignettes in which a protagonist performs a good deed and is asked about it by a teacher, either in front of the class or in private. In response, the protagonist either tells a modest lie, which is highly valued by the Chinese culture, or tells an immodest truth, which violates the Chinese cultural norms about modesty. Children were asked to identify whether the protagonist’s statement was the truth or a lie, and to evaluate how ‘good’ or ‘bad’ the statement was. Chinese children rated modest lies more positively than immodest truths, with this effect becoming more pronounced with age. Rural Chinese children and those with at least one nonprofessional parent rated immodest truths less positively when they were told in public rather than in private. Furthermore, Chinese children of parents with high collectivism scores valued modest lies more than did children of parents with low collectivism scores. These findings suggest that both macro- and micro-cultural factors contribute significantly to children’s moral understanding of truth and lie telling.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00495.x
发表时间: 2009-08
期刊: Social development (Oxford, England)
影响因子: --
作者:
Heyman GD;Sweet MA;Lee K
通讯作者: Lee K
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.4.703
发表时间: 1996-10-01
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
DePaulo, BM;Bell, KL
通讯作者: Bell, KL
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.t01-1-00506
发表时间: 2002-11-01
期刊: CHILD DEVELOPMENT
影响因子: 4.6
作者:
Killen, M;Crystal, DS;Watanabe, H
通讯作者: Watanabe, H
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9507.00212
发表时间: 2002-01-01
期刊: SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
影响因子: 2
作者:
Banerjee, R
通讯作者: Banerjee, R
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.04.003
发表时间: 2009-10
影响因子: 2.6
作者:
Eskritt M;Lee K
通讯作者: Lee K