Does Model Calibration Reduce Uncertainty in Climate Projections?
Does Model Calibration Reduce Uncertainty in Climate Projections?
复制标题
模型校准是否会降低气候预测的不确定性?
DOI:
10.1175/jcli-d-21-0434.1
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
4.9
通讯作者:
Tett S
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tett S
Uncertainty in climate projections is large as shown by the likely uncertainty ranges in equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) of 2.5–4 K and in the transient climate response (TCR) of 1.4–2.2 K. Uncertainty in model projections could arise from the way in which unresolved processes are represented, the parameter values used, or the targets for model calibration. We show that, in two climate model ensembles that were objectively calibrated to minimize differences from observed large-scale atmospheric climatology, uncertainties in ECS and TCR are about 2–6 times smaller than in the CMIP5 or CMIP6 multimodel ensemble. We also find that projected uncertainties in surface temperature, precipitation, and annual extremes are relatively small. Residual uncertainty largely arises from unconstrained sea ice feedbacks. The more than 20-year-old HadAM3 standard model configuration simulates observed hemispheric-scale observations and preindustrial surface temperatures about as well as the median CMIP5 and CMIP6 ensembles while the optimized configurations simulate these better than almost all the CMIP5 and CMIP6 models. Hemispheric-scale observations and preindustrial temperatures are not systematically better simulated in CMIP6 than in CMIP5 although the CMIP6 ensemble seems to better simulate patterns of large-scale observations than the CMIP5 ensemble and the optimized HadAM3 configurations. Our results suggest that most CMIP models could be improved in their simulation of large-scale observations by systematic calibration. However, the uncertainty in climate projections (for a given scenario) likely largely arises from the choice of parameterization schemes for unresolved processes (“structural uncertainty”), with different tuning targets another possible contributor.Significance StatementClimate models represent unresolved phenomena controlled by uncertain parameters. Changes in these parameters impact how well a climate model simulates current climate and its climate projections. Multiple calibrations of a single climate model, using an objective method, to large-scale atmospheric observations are performed. These models produce very similar climate projections at both global and regional scales. An analysis that combines uncertainties in observations with simulated sensitivity to observations and climate response also has small uncertainty showing that, for this model, current observations constrain climate projections. Recently developed climate models have a broad range of abilities to simulate large-scale climate with only some improvement in their ability to simulate this despite a decade of model development.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.9
作者:
S. Tett;D. Rowlands;M. Mineter;C. Cartis
通讯作者:
C. Cartis
DOI:
10.1002/jgrd.50304
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
影响因子:
--
作者:
K. Yamazaki;D. Rowlands;T. Aina;A. Blaker;A. Bowery;N. Massey;Jonathan Miller;C. Rye;S. Tett;D. Williamson;Y. Yamazaki;M. Allen
通讯作者:
M. Allen
影响因子:
18.3
作者:
Rowlands, Daniel J.;Frame, David J.;Allen, Myles R.
通讯作者:
Allen, Myles R.
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2007
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
Chris G. Knight;Sylvia Knight;N. Massey;T. Aina;C. Christensen;D. Frame;J. Kettleborough;Andrew Martin;S. Pascoe;B. Sanderson;D. Stainforth;M. Allen
通讯作者:
M. Allen
影响因子:
4.9
作者:
S. Tett;M. Mineter;C. Cartis;D. Rowlands;Ping Liu
通讯作者:
Ping Liu