Consistency and variability in functional localisers.

Consistency and variability in functional localisers.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.014
复制
发表时间:
2009-07-15
期刊:
影响因子:
5.7
通讯作者:
Devlin JT
Devlin JT
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Duncan KJ;Pattamadilok C;Knierim I;Devlin JT

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

使用功能定位器扫描的关键假设是,被识别为功能感兴趣区域(fROI)的体素基本上与主要实验操作激活的体素相同。fROI位置的受试者内变异性违反了这一假设,降低了分析的灵敏度并使结果产生偏差。在这里,我们调查了一组45名志愿者的fROI的一致性和可变性。他们进行了两次功能定位器扫描,以分别识别腹侧和侧枕颞皮层的单词敏感区和物体敏感区。在主要分析中,fROI被定义为每个区域中的类别选择性体素,一致性被测量为扫描之间的空间重叠。当使用最小选择性阈值来定义“活性”体素时(p < 0.05未校正),一致性最大,表明大约65%的体素通常被两次扫描激活。相比之下,高选择性阈值(p < 10− 4至10− 6)产生的一致性值最低,两次扫描中活动体素的重叠小于25%。换句话说,受试者内变异性惊人地高,给定fROI中三分之一到四分之三的体素与主任务中激活的体素不对应。这种水平的变异性与视网膜定位定义区域中的一致性形成鲜明对比,并且对于设计鲁棒但有效的功能定位器扫描具有重要意义。
A critical assumption underlying the use of functional localiser scans is that the voxels identified as the functional region-of-interest (fROI) are essentially the same as those activated by the main experimental manipulation. Intra-subject variability in the location of the fROI violates this assumption, reducing the sensitivity of the analysis and biasing the results. Here we investigated consistency and variability in fROIs in a set of 45 volunteers. They performed two functional localiser scans to identify word- and object-sensitive regions of ventral and lateral occipito-temporal cortex, respectively. In the main analyses, fROIs were defined as the category-selective voxels in each region and consistency was measured as the spatial overlap between scans. Consistency was greatest when minimally selective thresholds were used to define “active” voxels (p < 0.05 uncorrected), revealing that approximately 65% of the voxels were commonly activated by both scans. In contrast, highly selective thresholds (p < 10− 4 to 10− 6) yielded the lowest consistency values with less than 25% overlap of the voxels active in both scans. In other words, intra-subject variability was surprisingly high, with between one third and three quarters of the voxels in a given fROI not corresponding to those activated in the main task. This level of variability stands in striking contrast to the consistency seen in retinotopically-defined areas and has important implications for designing robust but efficient functional localiser scans.
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.6.911
发表时间: 2006-06
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
Devlin, Joseph T.;Jamison, Helen L.;Gonnerman, Laura M.;Matthews, Paul M.
通讯作者: Matthews, Paul M.
DOI: 10.1038/33402
发表时间: 1998-04-09
期刊: NATURE
影响因子: 64.8
作者:
Epstein, R;Kanwisher, N
通讯作者: Kanwisher, N
DOI: 10.1097/wnp.0b013e31803bb59a
发表时间: 2007-06-01
影响因子: 2.4
作者:
Farrell, Donald F.;Burbank, Nicole;Ojemann, George A.
通讯作者: Ojemann, George A.
DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00435-x
发表时间: 2003-10-01
期刊: NEUROIMAGE
影响因子: 5.7
作者:
Beckmann, CF;Jenkinson, M;Smith, SM
通讯作者: Smith, SM
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.3619-06.2007
发表时间: 2007-01-03
影响因子: 5.3
作者:
Downing, Paul E.;Wiggett, Alison J.;Peelen, Marius V.
通讯作者: Peelen, Marius V.