What predicts changes in useful field of view test performance?

What predicts changes in useful field of view test performance?
复制标题

什么可以预测有用视场测试性能的变化?

DOI:
10.1037/a0013466
复制
发表时间:
2008
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Roenker,DanielL
Roenker,DanielL
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lunsman,Melissa;Edwards,JerriD;Andel,Ross;Small,BrentJ;Ball,KarleneK;Roenker,DanielL

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

有用视野测试(UFOV)已被用于检查与年龄相关的视觉处理和认知变化,并作为日常表现结果的指标,特别是驾驶,超过20年。UFOV性能如何随年龄变化以及可能影响这种变化的因素以前没有纵向研究。研究了来自独立和重要老年人高级认知训练(ACTIVE)研究的对照组参与者(N= 690)在5年期间UFOV性能变化的预测因素。随机效应模型估计与4-subtest-total UFOV的结果和基线年龄,教育,性别,种族,视力,抑郁症状,精神状态,自我评价的健康,以及磨损,作为预测因子。UFOV的性能一般遵循曲线模式,随着时间的推移而改善,然后下降。随着时间的推移,只有年龄的增加与UFOV性能的更大下降相关。UFOV和数字符号替换子测验(认知速度的标准测量)具有相似的变化轨迹。这些结果的影响进行了讨论。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2024阿帕,保留所有权利)
The Useful Field of View Test (UFOV) has been used as an examination of age-related changes in visual processing and cognition and as an indicator of everyday performance outcomes, particularly driving, for over 20 years. How UFOV performance changes with age and what may impact such changes have not previously been investigated longitudinally. Predictors of change in UFOV performance over a 5-year period among control group participants (N= 690) from the Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly (ACTIVE) study were examined. Random effects models were estimated with 4-subtest-total UFOV as the outcome and with baseline age, education, gender, race, visual acuity, depressive symptoms, mental status, and self-rated health, as well as attrition, as predictors. UFOV performance generally followed a curvilinear pattern, improving and then declining over time. Only increased age was consistently related to greater declines in UFOV performance over time. UFOV and Digit Symbol Substitution subtest, a standard measure of cognitive speed, had similar trajectories of change. The implications of these results are discussed.(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)
DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.18.2271
发表时间: 2002-11-13
影响因子: 120.7
作者:
Ball, K;Berch, DB;Willis, SL
通讯作者: Willis, SL
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-7272-8_24
发表时间: 1983
影响因子: 4.3
作者:
G. Verriest;L. Barca;A. Dubois;M. Houtmans;B. Inditsky;Chris A. Johnson;I. Overington;L. Ronchi;S. Villani
通讯作者: S. Villani
DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.22.3.558
发表时间: 2007-09-01
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Finkel, Deborah;McArdle, John J.;Pedersen, Nancy L.
通讯作者: Pedersen, Nancy L.
功能性视野中选择过程的某些方面。
DOI: --
发表时间: 1970
期刊: Ergonomics
影响因子: 2.4
作者:
A. Sanders
通讯作者: A. Sanders
DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.3.470
发表时间: 2003-09-01
影响因子: 4.1
作者:
Anstey, KJ;Hofer, SM;Luszcz, MA
通讯作者: Luszcz, MA