Single Molecule Force Spectroscopy Reveals Distinctions in Key Biophysical Parameters of αβ T-Cell Receptors Compared with Chimeric Antigen Receptors Directed at the Same Ligand.

Single Molecule Force Spectroscopy Reveals Distinctions in Key Biophysical Parameters of αβ T-Cell Receptors Compared with Chimeric Antigen Receptors Directed at the Same Ligand.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02240
复制
发表时间:
2021-08-12
影响因子:
5.7
通讯作者:
Lang, Matthew J.
Lang, Matthew J.
中科院分区:
化学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Banik, Debasis;Hamidinia, Maryam;Brzostek, Joanna;Wu, Ling;Stephens, Hannah M.;MacAry, Paul A.;Reinherz, Ellis L.;Gascoigne, Nicholas R. J.;Lang, Matthew J.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

嵌合抗原受体 (CAR) T 细胞疗法利用简单的抗体介导的靶向来在患者中引发有用的免疫反应。这项工作直接将 CAR 和 αβ T 细胞受体 (TCR) 的结合谱与针对共享配体的单细胞和单分子光阱测量进行比较。 CAR 和 TCR 中肽-主要组织相容性复合物 (pMHC) 配体相互作用的 DNA 束缚测量显示与特定肽激动剂的捕获键分别在 25 和 14 pN 处达到峰值。虽然构象转变在 TCR-pMHC 系统中经常出现,但 CAR-pMHC 系统的构象转变不同、不常见、程度较低且不可逆。使用 CD19 特异性 CAR T 细胞和映射到 MHC α2 螺旋但对结合肽不感兴趣的单克隆抗体观察到滑移键。总的来说,这些发现表明 CAR-pMHC 界面支持 CAR 对 pMHC 配体的捕获键反应,这与针对典型配体的 CAR 的滑移键反应形成鲜明对比。
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies exploit facile antibody-mediated targeting to elicit useful immune responses in patients. This work directly compares binding profiles of CAR and αβ T-cell receptors (TCR) with single cell and single molecule optical trap measurements against a shared ligand. DNA-tethered measurements of peptide-major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) ligand interaction in both CAR and TCR exhibit catch bonds with specific peptide agonist peaking at 25 and 14 pN, respectively. While a conformational transition is regularly seen in TCR–pMHC systems, that of CAR–pMHC systems is dissimilar, being infrequent, of lower magnitude, and irreversible. Slip bonds are observed with CD19-specific CAR T-cells and with a monoclonal antibody mapping to the MHC α2 helix but indifferent to the bound peptide. Collectively, these findings suggest that the CAR–pMHC interface underpins the CAR catch bond response to pMHC ligands in contradistinction to slip bonds for CARs targeting canonical ligands.
DOI: 10.1038/nchembio.2565
发表时间: 2018-03
影响因子: 14.8
作者:
Chang ZL;Lorenzini MH;Chen X;Tran U;Bangayan NJ;Chen YY
通讯作者: Chen YY
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m109.052712
发表时间: 2009-11-06
影响因子: 4.8
作者:
Kim, Sun Taek;Takeuchi, Koh;Reinherz, Ellis L.
通讯作者: Reinherz, Ellis L.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2005899117
发表时间: 2020-09-01
影响因子: 11.1
作者:
Hwang, Wonmuk;Mallis, Robert J.;Reinherz, Ellis L.
通讯作者: Reinherz, Ellis L.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1716266115
发表时间: 2018-02-27
影响因子: 11.1
作者:
Davenport AJ;Cross RS;Watson KA;Liao Y;Shi W;Prince HM;Beavis PA;Trapani JA;Kershaw MH;Ritchie DS;Darcy PK;Neeson PJ;Jenkins MR
通讯作者: Jenkins MR
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00076
发表时间: 2012
影响因子: 7.3
作者:
Kim ST;Shin Y;Brazin K;Mallis RJ;Sun ZY;Wagner G;Lang MJ;Reinherz EL
通讯作者: Reinherz EL