INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES On Racial Diversity and Group Decision Making : Identifying Multiple Effects of Racial Composition on Jury Deliberations
INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES On Racial Diversity and Group Decision Making : Identifying Multiple Effects of Racial Composition on Jury Deliberations
复制标题
关于种族多样性和群体决策的人际关系和群体过程：识别种族构成对陪审团审议的多重影响
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2006
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Samuel R. Sommers
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Samuel R. Sommers
本研究考察了种族多样性对群体决策的多重影响。参与者作为种族同质或异质模拟陪审团的成员审议对一名黑人被告的审判。其中一半的小组在审前接受了有关种族主义的陪审团选择问题，另一半则没有。审议分析支持了这样一种预测，即不同的群体会比全白人群体交流更广泛的信息。这一发现并不完全归因于黑人参与者的表现，因为白人引用了更多的案例事实，犯了更少的错误，并且在与全白人群体相比，在多元化群体中更容易接受种族主义的讨论。即使在讨论之前，不同群体中的白人对黑人被告也更宽容，这表明多样性的影响不仅仅是通过信息交换产生的。陪审团选择问题的影响扩展了先前的发现，即在审判中公然的种族问题会增加对黑人被告的宽大处理。
This research examines the multiple effects of racial diversity on group decision making. Participants deliberated on the trial of a Black defendant as members of racially homogeneous or heterogeneous mock juries. Half of the groups were exposed to pretrial jury selection questions about racism and half were not. Deliberation analyses supported the prediction that diverse groups would exchange a wider range of information than all-White groups. This finding was not wholly attributable to the performance of Black participants, as Whites cited more case facts, made fewer errors, and were more amenable to discussion of racism when in diverse versus all-White groups. Even before discussion, Whites in diverse groups were more lenient toward the Black defendant, demonstrating that the effects of diversity do not occur solely through information exchange. The influence of jury selection questions extended previous findings that blatant racial issues at trial increase leniency toward a Black defendant.
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
D. Wegener;R. Petty
通讯作者：
D. Wegener;R. Petty
DOI：
--
发表时间：
1996
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
E. H. Witte;J. H. Davis
通讯作者：
E. H. Witte;J. H. Davis
污名化的来源和说服：偏见作为论证审查的决定因素。
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Petty,RE;Fleming,MA;White,PH
通讯作者：
White,PH