When election expectations fail: Polarized perceptions of election legitimacy increase with accumulating evidence of election outcomes and with polarized media.
When election expectations fail: Polarized perceptions of election legitimacy increase with accumulating evidence of election outcomes and with polarized media.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0259473
复制
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Van Boven L
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Grant MD;Flores A;Pedersen EJ;Sherman DK;Van Boven L
The present study, conducted immediately after the 2020 presidential election in the United States, examined whether Democrats’ and Republicans’ polarized assessments of election legitimacy increased over time. In a naturalistic survey experiment, people (N = 1,236) were randomly surveyed either during the week following Election Day, with votes cast but the outcome unknown, or during the following week, after President Joseph Biden was widely declared the winner. The design unconfounded the election outcome announcement from the vote itself, allowing more precise testing of predictions derived from cognitive dissonance theory. As predicted, perceived election legitimacy increased among Democrats, from the first to the second week following Election Day, as their expected Biden win was confirmed, whereas perceived election legitimacy decreased among Republicans as their expected President Trump win was disconfirmed. From the first to the second week following Election Day, Republicans reported stronger negative emotions and weaker positive emotions while Democrats reported stronger positive emotions and weaker negative emotions. The polarized perceptions of election legitimacy were correlated with the tendencies to trust and consume polarized media. Consumption of Fox News was associated with lowered perceptions of election legitimacy over time whereas consumption of other outlets was associated with higher perceptions of election legitimacy over time. Discussion centers on the role of the media in the experience of cognitive dissonance and the implications of polarized perceptions of election legitimacy for psychology, political science, and the future of democratic society.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
2.3
作者:
Esaiasson, Peter
通讯作者:
Esaiasson, Peter
影响因子:
4.6
作者:
Flesken, Anaid;Hartl, Jakob
通讯作者:
Hartl, Jakob
影响因子:
2.3
作者:
Levy, Morris
通讯作者:
Levy, Morris
DOI:
10.1016/s0065-2601(08)00403-6
发表时间:
2009-01-01
期刊:
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 41
影响因子:
--
作者:
Harmon-Jones, Eddie;Amodio, David M.;Harmon-Jones, Cindy
通讯作者:
Harmon-Jones, Cindy
影响因子:
1.9
作者:
Gawronski, Bertram
通讯作者:
Gawronski, Bertram