Protection against retroviruses are owing to a different form of immunity. An RNA-based molecular immunity hypothesis.
Protection against retroviruses are owing to a different form of immunity. An RNA-based molecular immunity hypothesis.
复制标题
针对逆转录病毒的保护是由于不同形式的免疫。
DOI:
10.1097/00129039-200006000-00008
复制
发表时间:
2000
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Amjad,M
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bagasra,O;Amjad,M
In the course of scientific investigation, data sometimes emerge that cannot be readily reconciled with existing theory. Yet scientists by nature are reluctant to accept new ideas when the old theories still seem viable, even when they are in need of revision or update. Usually the consequences of this scientific reticence are simply enlivened debates at academic conferences or in scholarly journals. However, in the field of human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) pathogenesis, the effect of a decade and half-long lack of progress in understanding the fundamental biology of the retroviral infection can be measured in human terms—literally more than 40 million people may be infected with HIV-1 by now, and this number will increase to 100 million by the dawn of the new millennium. Many of HIV-1 infected individuals will likely die from acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and its complications if rapid progress is not made. Effective treatments must be developed that work at the molecular level because that is the scale on which retroviruses function, and an effective vaccine for HIV-1 is desperately needed because the epidemic continues to expand worldwide (1).Clues to effective treatment and vaccine have long been before us but conventional wisdom has repeatedly misguided us during scientific investigation. Just 5 years ago, for example, most scientists thought that HIV-1 infection included a long latency period in which there was little or no viral activity. We now know that this hypothesis may be incorrect and that resulting lines of inquiry lead to blind alleys (2). Worse still, inconsistencies between observed facts and prevailing theory have led to the expenditure of considerable capital over a futile argument over the etiologic agent of AIDS—long after overwhelming data have incontrovertibly shown HIV-1 to be the cause of the disease. The dissenters of the “HIV-AIDS hypothesis” have made some valid observations, particularly involving the various “cofactors” that clearly influence the course of HIV-1 pathogenesis (3), yet mainstream scientists seem to have focused more energy on being appalled by the dissenters than on trying to examine and accommodate the kernels of truth in their arguments. Existing immunologic theory makes the accommodation of these dissenters' concepts as well as considerable quantities of other data (ie, live attenuated vaccine strains of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), epidemiologic and laboratory data) exceedingly difficult.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
158.5
作者:
Fauci, AS
通讯作者:
Fauci, AS
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
P. Putkonen;Rigmor Thorstensson;Jan Albert;Kerstin Hild;Erling Norrby;Peter Biberfeld;Gunnel Biberfeld
通讯作者:
Gunnel Biberfeld
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
M. Girard;J. Eichberg
通讯作者:
J. Eichberg
影响因子:
82.9
作者:
O. Smith
通讯作者:
O. Smith
影响因子:
1
作者:
Ernst Veith
通讯作者:
Ernst Veith