Incorporating basic needs to reconcile poverty and ecosystem services.
Incorporating basic needs to reconcile poverty and ecosystem services.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/cobi.13209
复制
发表时间：
2019-06
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Schulte-Herbrüggen B
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Chaigneau T;Coulthard S;Brown K;Daw TM;Schulte-Herbrüggen B
保护管理者经常面临保护和维持生物多样性的挑战，而不会对依赖生态系统服务的人类（通常是穷人）产生有害后果。然而，互利的解决方案往往难以实现，可能会掩盖人们的权衡和负面结果。为了处理这种权衡，需要确定生态和社会阈值，以确定可接受的保护解决方案空间。虽然人类福祉作为一个概念最近获得了突出地位，但保护主义者仍然缺乏工具来评估他们的行为如何在特定背景下影响它。我们将人类需求理论应用于保护，建立在国际发展中需求方法的广泛历史应用的基础上。在一个创新的参与性方法，包括焦点小组和家庭调查，我们评估了如何满足人类需求的基础上，当地相关的阈值。然后，我们通过关键知情人焦点小组建立了人类需求和生态系统服务之间的联系。我们将我们的方法应用于东非沿海地区，以确定无法满足其基本需求的家庭，并揭示生态系统服务在满足这些需求方面的作用。这使我们能够确定来自环境的惠益如何有助于满足基本需求，并考虑通过改变生态系统服务的提供可能产生的潜在影响。我们建议我们的方法可以帮助保护主义者和规划者平衡扶贫和生物多样性保护，并确保保护措施至少不会对个人造成严重伤害。我们进一步认为，它可以被用来作为一个基础，监测保护多维贫困的影响。 文章影响声明：评估人类需求及其与生态系统服务的联系有助于平衡减贫和保护生物多样性。
Conservation managers frequently face the challenge of protecting and sustaining biodiversity without producing detrimental outcomes for (often poor) human populations that depend on ecosystem services for their well‐being. However, mutually beneficial solutions are often elusive and can mask trade‐offs and negative outcomes for people. To deal with such trade‐offs, ecological and social thresholds need to be identified to determine the acceptable solution space for conservation. Although human well‐being as a concept has recently gained prominence, conservationists still lack tools to evaluate how their actions affect it in a given context. We applied the theory of human needs to conservation by building on an extensive historical application of need approaches in international development. In an innovative participatory method that included focus groups and household surveys, we evaluated how human needs are met based on locally relevant thresholds. We then established connections between human needs and ecosystem services through key‐informant focus groups. We applied our method in coastal East Africa to identify households that would not be able to meet their basic needs and to uncover the role of ecosystem services in meeting these. This enabled us to identify how benefits derived from the environment were contributing to meeting basic needs and to consider potential repercussions that could arise through changes to ecosystem service provision. We suggest our approach can help conservationists and planners balance poverty alleviation and biodiversity protection and ensure conservation measures do not, at the very least, cause serious harm to individuals. We further argue it can be used as a basis for monitoring the impacts of conservation on multidimensional poverty. Article impact statement: Assessing human needs and their connections with ecosystem services helps balance poverty alleviation and biodiversity protection.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.04.002
发表时间：
2013-10-01
影响因子：
8.9
作者：
Fisher, Janet A.;Patenaude, Genevieve;Woodhouse, Iain H.
通讯作者：
Woodhouse, Iain H.
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
McGregor, J. Allister;Camfield, Laura;Woodcock, Alison
通讯作者：
Woodcock, Alison
DOI：
10.1111/cobi.12277
发表时间：
2014-10
期刊：
Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
影响因子：
--
作者：
Milner-Gulland EJ;McGregor JA;Agarwala M;Atkinson G;Bevan P;Clements T;Daw T;Homewood K;Kumpel N;Lewis J;Mourato S;Palmer Fry B;Redshaw M;Rowcliffe JM;Suon S;Wallace G;Washington H;Wilkie D
通讯作者：
Wilkie D
DOI：
10.1073/pnas.1414900112
发表时间：
2015-06-02
影响因子：
11.1
作者：
Daw, Tim M.;Coulthard, Sarah;Munyi, Lydiah
通讯作者：
Munyi, Lydiah
影响因子：
4.1
作者：
Christensen, Lisa;Krogman, Naomi
通讯作者：
Krogman, Naomi