The contribution of anthropology to the study of Open Dialogue: ethnographic research methods and opportunities.
The contribution of anthropology to the study of Open Dialogue: ethnographic research methods and opportunities.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1111588
复制
发表时间：
2023
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
Wuerth, Milena
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mosse, David;Baker, Darren;Carroll, Molly;Chase, Liana;Kloocke, Ruth;Wickremasinghe, Kiara;Cramer, Bethan;Pratt-Boyden, Keira;Wuerth, Milena
关键词：
当公开对话作为一种精神卫生保健方法在国际上多样化时，用于描述、解释和评估这种替代现有精神病服务的研究方法也是如此。本文认为人类学的贡献及其核心方法民族志在这些方法。它回顾了人类学开辟的心理健康研究的方法学机会，特别是关于临床过程和机构背景的详细知识。这种知识对于通过确定事先不可知的实施所必需的背景因素，在实践中推广创新很重要。本文解释了民族志模式的调查，探讨这一点更详细的方法，一个人类学研究的帐户正在进行中，在英国的重点是同行支持的开放对话（POD）在国民保健服务（NHS）。它规定了这项研究的目标，设计和范围，研究人员的各种作用，实地研究的地点和民族志和公开对话之间的具体互动。这项研究在设计、背景、进行和产生的数据种类方面都是原创性的，既带来了机遇，也带来了挑战。这些解释，以提高开放对话研究和人类学更广泛的相关性的方法问题。
When Open Dialogue diversifies internationally as an approach to mental healthcare, so too do the research methodologies used to describe, explain and evaluate this alternative to existing psychiatric services. This article considers the contribution of anthropology and its core method of ethnography among these approaches. It reviews the methodological opportunities in mental health research opened up by anthropology, and specifically the detailed knowledge about clinical processes and institutional contexts. Such knowledge is important in order to generalize innovations in practice by identifying contextual factors necessary to implementation that are unknowable in advance. The article explains the ethnographic mode of investigation, exploring this in more detail with an account of the method of one anthropological study under way in the UK focused on Peer-Supported Open Dialogue (POD) in the National Health Service (NHS). It sets out the objectives, design and scope of this research study, the varied roles of researchers, the sites of field research and the specific interaction between ethnography and Open Dialogue. This study is original in its design, context, conduct and the kind of data produced, and presents both opportunities and challenges. These are explained in order to raise issues of method that are of wider relevance to Open Dialogue research and anthropology.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.2
作者：
Cubellis L;Schmid C;von Peter S
通讯作者：
von Peter S
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Bennett, L. Michelle;Gadlin, Howard
通讯作者：
Gadlin, Howard
影响因子：
1.7
作者：
Cubellis, Lauren
通讯作者：
Cubellis, Lauren
影响因子：
2.1
作者：
Dawson, Lisa;River, Jo;Buus, Niels
通讯作者：
Buus, Niels
影响因子：
1.4
作者：
Descola, Philippe
通讯作者：
Descola, Philippe