The lexical boost effect is not diagnostic of lexically-specific syntactic representations
The lexical boost effect is not diagnostic of lexically-specific syntactic representations
复制标题
词汇增强效应不能诊断词汇特定的句法表征
DOI:
10.1016/j.jml.2017.03.001
复制
发表时间:
2017
影响因子:
4.3
通讯作者:
Scheepers C
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Scheepers C
Structural priming implies that speakers/listeners unknowingly re-use syntactic structure over subsequent utterances. Previous research found that structural priming is reliably enhanced when lexical content is repeated (lexical boost effect). A widely held assumption is that structure-licensing heads enjoy a privileged role in lexically boosting structural priming. The present comprehension-to-production priming experiments investigated whether head-constituents (verbs) versus non-head constituents (argument nouns) contribute differently to boosting ditransitive structure priming in English. Experiment 1 showed that lexical boosts from repeated agent or recipient nouns (and to a lesser extent, repeated theme nouns) were comparable to those from repeated verbs. Experiments 2 and 3 found that increasingnumbersof content words shared between primes and targets led to increasing magnitudes of structural priming (again, with no ‘special’ contribution of verb-repetition). We conclude that lexical boost effects are not diagnostic of lexically-specific syntactic representations, even though such representations are supported by other types of evidence.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
5.4
作者:
Chang, F;Dell, GS;Bock, K
通讯作者:
Bock, K
影响因子:
2.5
作者:
Chang, Franklin;Janciauskas, Marius;Fitz, Hartmut
通讯作者:
Fitz, Hartmut
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2015
期刊:
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
影响因子:
--
作者:
M. Traxler
通讯作者:
M. Traxler
影响因子:
2.5
作者:
K. Segaert;G. Kempen;K. Petersson;P. Hagoort
通讯作者:
K. Segaert;G. Kempen;K. Petersson;P. Hagoort
影响因子:
3.4
作者:
Katherine E. Twomey;F. Chang;Ben Ambridge
通讯作者:
Ben Ambridge