Does the Implicit Association Test for assessing anxiety measure trait and state variance?
Does the Implicit Association Test for assessing anxiety measure trait and state variance?
复制标题
用于评估焦虑的内隐关联测试是否衡量特质和状态差异？
DOI：
10.1002/per.525
复制
发表时间：
2004
影响因子：
5.9
通讯作者：
B. Egloff
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Schmukle;B. Egloff
用于评估焦虑（IAT-焦虑）的内隐关联测试的稳定性低于其内部一致性，表明 IAT-焦虑测量稳定的方差和特定场合的方差。这表明 IAT 焦虑可能不仅是特质焦虑的有效衡量标准，也是状态焦虑的衡量标准之一。为了检验这一假设，进行了两项研究，其中通过公开演讲任务实验诱发了状态焦虑。然而，两项研究都表明，当诱发焦虑状态时，IAT-焦虑评分没有变化。因此，除了状态焦虑的变化之外，特定场合的因素似乎也会导致 IAT 焦虑评分的特定场合的变化。讨论了用 IAT 间接评估人格倾向的意义。版权所有 © 2004 约翰·威利父子有限公司
The stability of the Implicit Association Test for assessing anxiety (IAT‐Anxiety) is lower than its internal consistency, indicating that the IAT‐Anxiety measures both stable and occasion‐specific variance. This suggests that the IAT‐Anxiety may be not only a valid measure of trait anxiety but also one of state anxiety. To test this assumption, two studies were conducted in which state anxiety was experimentally induced by a public speaking task. However, both studies showed that the IAT‐Anxiety score did not change when a state of anxiety was induced. Thus, it seems that occasion‐specific factors other than variations in state anxiety lead to occasion‐specific variance in the IAT‐Anxiety score. Implications for the indirect assessment of personality dispositions with the IAT are discussed. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Greenwald, AG;Nosek, BA;Banaji, MR
通讯作者：
Banaji, MR
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Greenwald, AG;McGhee, DE;Schwartz, JLK
通讯作者：
Schwartz, JLK
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
Greenwald, AG;Banaji, MR;Mellott, DS
通讯作者：
Mellott, DS
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
J. Bosson;W. Swann;J. Pennebaker
通讯作者：
J. Bosson;W. Swann;J. Pennebaker
认知和心理动力学无意识的整合。
DOI：
10.1037//0003-066x.49.8.709
发表时间：
1994
期刊：
The American psychologist
影响因子：
--
作者：
Epstein,S
通讯作者：
Epstein,S