Degenerate boundaries for multiple-alternative decisions.
Degenerate boundaries for multiple-alternative decisions.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1038/s41467-022-32741-y
复制
发表时间:
2022-08-29
影响因子:
16.6
通讯作者:
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Integration-to-threshold models of two-choice perceptual decision making have guided our understanding of human and animal behavior and neural processing. Although such models seem to extend naturally to multiple-choice decision making, consensus on a normative framework has yet to emerge, and hence the implications of threshold characteristics for multiple choices have only been partially explored. Here we consider sequential Bayesian inference and a conceptualisation of decision making as a particle diffusing in n-dimensions. We show by simulation that, within a parameterised subset of time-independent boundaries, the optimal decision boundaries comprise a degenerate family of nonlinear structures that jointly depend on the state of multiple accumulators and speed-accuracy trade-offs. This degeneracy is contrary to current 2-choice results where there is a single optimal threshold. Such boundaries support both stationary and collapsing thresholds as optimal strategies for decision-making, both of which result from stationary representations of nonlinear boundaries. Our findings point towards a normative theory of multiple-choice decision making, provide a characterisation of optimal decision thresholds under this framework, and inform the debate between stationary and dynamic decision boundaries for optimal decision making. How animals make multiple-choice decisions over three or more alternatives is not well understood. Here the authors use simulations to uncover that there is not one but many optimal parameter value configurations on the reward landscape of the multiple-choice threshold boundaries.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
5.7
作者:
Churchland AK;Ditterich J
通讯作者:
Ditterich J
影响因子:
5.3
作者:
Hawkins, Guy E.;Forstmann, Birte U.;Brown, Scott D.
通讯作者:
Brown, Scott D.
影响因子:
4.8
作者:
Keuken MC;Van Maanen L;Bogacz R;Schäfer A;Neumann J;Turner R;Forstmann BU
通讯作者:
Forstmann BU
影响因子:
16.2
作者:
Heitz RP;Schall JD
通讯作者:
Schall JD
影响因子:
1.7
作者:
Balci, Fuat;Simen, Patrick;Cohen, Jonathan D.
通讯作者:
Cohen, Jonathan D.