Effects of different functional units on carbon footprint values of different carbohydrate-rich foods in China
Effects of different functional units on carbon footprint values of different carbohydrate-rich foods in China
复制标题
不同功能单元对中国不同富含碳水化合物食品碳足迹值的影响
DOI:
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.091
复制
发表时间:
2018-10
影响因子:
11.1
通讯作者:
Zhang ZH
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Xu Zhongyue;Xu Weijun;Peng Zijin;Xu Zhongyue;Yang Qingyu;Zhang Zhihang;Xu WJ;Zhang ZH
The food sector produces large amounts of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, which has attracted attention of many researchers. Previous studies evaluated food carbon footprints (CFs) mainly based on food weight. Nutrient content of food could reflect food function better. However, different conclusions could be drawn based on different individual nutrients. The comprehensive trophic index has been used to evaluate food nutrition. In this study, CFs of nineteen carbohydrate-rich (CR) foods including grains, beans, root and tuber-food were investigated based on different functional units (weight, energy, protein, carbohydrate, and two comprehensive trophic indexes Nu21and Nu11). The CF rankings of the foods varied when weight based-, energy based-, and individual nutrient based functional units were used. Potato, cereal foods, and beans showed the low-CF advantage when weight based-, carbohydrate based-, and protein based functional unit was used, respectively. Covering more nutrients in the functional unit is beneficial to get closer to the truth of environmental impact of different foods. The comprehensive trophic index based functional unit was more appropriate for illustrating food CFs. Nu21method was fairer to evaluate food CF from the viewpoint of individual food, while Nu11method was more appropriate from the viewpoint of balanced diet. The results also exhibited that consumption of more brown rice and standard grade flour could be a feasible plan to reduce carbon emissions in nowadays. Meanwhile, enhancing rotation of coarse cereals and increasing consumption of coarse foods could cut a considerable amount of carbon emissions further.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2013-12
期刊:
Future of Food: Journal on Food, Agriculture and Society
影响因子:
--
作者:
Cristina P. Rodríguez Torres
通讯作者:
Cristina P. Rodríguez Torres
影响因子:
5.5
作者:
Poritosh Roy;T. Ijiri;D. Nei;Takahiro Orikasa;H. Okadome;N. Nakamura;T. Shiina
通讯作者:
Poritosh Roy;T. Ijiri;D. Nei;Takahiro Orikasa;H. Okadome;N. Nakamura;T. Shiina
DOI:
10.1007/s11367-010-0238-6
发表时间:
2011
期刊:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
影响因子:
--
作者:
Julia Martínez-Blanco;A. Antón;J. Rieradevall;M. Castellari;P. Muñoz
通讯作者:
Julia Martínez-Blanco;A. Antón;J. Rieradevall;M. Castellari;P. Muñoz
DOI:
10.1007/s11367-013-0576-2
发表时间:
2013-04
期刊:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
影响因子:
--
作者:
J. Webb;A. Williams;E. Hope;David Evans;E. Moorhouse
通讯作者:
J. Webb;A. Williams;E. Hope;David Evans;E. Moorhouse
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2008
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
作者:
J. Davis
通讯作者:
J. Davis