Cultural and moral dimensions of "clean food" labeling.
Cultural and moral dimensions of "clean food" labeling.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/eat.23617
复制
发表时间：
2022-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Javaras KN
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hudson JI;Javaras KN
Negowetti及其同事对“清洁食品”膳食标签的重要评论（Negowetti et al.，2021）描述了这种标签趋势的潜在“公共卫生影响”，并阐明了美国监管标签的“法律的和政策格局”。三篇评论（Chua &贝格，2021; Ghaderi，2021; Sharp &姆克林，2021）提供了进一步的说明，提供了东亚，欧洲和澳大利亚经验的额外考虑。评论和附带的评论相辅相成，提供了丰富多样的信息和观点有关的“清洁食品”标签。阅读这些文章，我们可以看到Negowetti和他的同事们所提到的“饮食行为的文化道德化”，强调了文化和道德维度与科学考虑的关系。首先，关于食品标签，正如Chua和贝格的评论中所提到的，有一个重要的文化维度影响着食品标签的方法和食品标签的具体内容。在美国，食品标签的一个主要目标是准确地识别单个成分。这种原子论的方法与美国强调指定药物的分子组成是一致的。它与一种更全面的方法形成对比，这种方法具有某些形式的传统医学的特征，例如中国传统医学，并且关注在身体系统内共同工作以保持平衡与和谐的成分的正确混合，而不是纠正特定的病理生理异常（Kaptchuk，2000）。因此，传统药物（包括草药产品）的标签不一定针对美国预期的特异性（Fung & Linn，2015）。此外，正如Chua和贝格指出的那样，在马来西亚和新加坡，人们对严格的标签要求有抵触情绪，因为“严格的规定可能会限制市场增长，与消费者需求相冲突，并被视为对根深蒂固的传统的挑战”。最终，标签的主要价值是提供信息，
The important review on “clean food” dietary labels by Negowetti and colleagues (Negowetti et al., 2021) describes potential “public health implications” of this labeling trend and sheds light on the “legal and policy landscape” for regulating labels in the United States. Three commentaries (Chua & Berg, 2021; Ghaderi, 2021; Sharp & McLean, 2021) provide further illumination, offering additional considerations informed by experience in East Asia, Europe, and Australia. The review and accompanying commentaries complement one another and provide rich and varied information and viewpoints relevant to “clean food” labeling. Reading them underscores Negowetti and colleagues’ reference to the “cultural moralization of eating behavior,” highlighting the involvement of cultural and moral dimensions alongside scientific considerations.First, concerning food labeling in general, there is an important cultural dimension that influences both the approach to food labeling and the specific content of food labels, as addressed in the commentary by Chua and Berg. In the United States, a major goal of food labels is to identify accurately the individual ingredients. This atomistic approach is consistent with the emphasis in the United States on specifying the molecular composition of pharmaceuticals. It contrasts with a more holistic approach that characterizes certain forms of traditional medicine, such as Chinese traditional medicine, and is concerned with the correct mixture of ingredients that work together within the bodily system to maintain equilibrium and harmony rather than correcting a specific pathophysiologic abnormality (Kaptchuk, 2000). Consequently, the labeling of traditional medicine (including herbal medicine products) does not necessarily aim for the specificity expected in the United States (Fung & Linn, 2015). Further, as Chua and Berg note, in Malaysia and Singapore there is resistance to strict labeling requirements because “stringent regulations may limit market growth, conflict with consumer demand, and be perceived as challenging deeply held traditions.” Ultimately, the principal value of labeling is to provide information that
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
Preston, Jesse Lee;Ritter, Ryan S.
通讯作者：
Ritter, Ryan S.
影响因子：
5.5
作者：
Negowetti, Nicole;Ambwani, Suman;Austin, S. Bryn
通讯作者：
Austin, S. Bryn
DOI：
10.1155/2015/425037
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM
影响因子：
--
作者：
Fung FY;Linn YC
通讯作者：
Linn YC
DOI：
10.1016/b978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4
发表时间：
2013-01-01
期刊：
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 47
影响因子：
--
作者：
Graham, Jesse;Haidt, Jonathan;Ditto, Peter H.
通讯作者：
Ditto, Peter H.