Is Granger causality a viable technique for analyzing fMRI data?
Is Granger causality a viable technique for analyzing fMRI data?
复制标题
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0067428
复制
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Ding M
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wen X;Rangarajan G;Ding M
Multivariate neural data provide the basis for assessing interactions in brain networks. Among myriad connectivity measures, Granger causality (GC) has proven to be statistically intuitive, easy to implement, and generate meaningful results. Although its application to functional MRI (fMRI) data is increasing, several factors have been identified that appear to hinder its neural interpretability: (a) latency differences in hemodynamic response function (HRF) across different brain regions, (b) low-sampling rates, and (c) noise. Recognizing that in basic and clinical neuroscience, it is often the change of a dependent variable (e.g., GC) between experimental conditions and between normal and pathology that is of interest, we address the question of whether there exist systematic relationships between GC at the fMRI level and that at the neural level. Simulated neural signals were convolved with a canonical HRF, down-sampled, and noise-added to generate simulated fMRI data. As the coupling parameters in the model were varied, fMRI GC and neural GC were calculated, and their relationship examined. Three main results were found: (1) GC following HRF convolution is a monotonically increasing function of neural GC; (2) this monotonicity can be reliably detected as a positive correlation when realistic fMRI temporal resolution and noise level were used; and (3) although the detectability of monotonicity declined due to the presence of HRF latency differences, substantial recovery of detectability occurred after correcting for latency differences. These results suggest that Granger causality is a viable technique for analyzing fMRI data when the questions are appropriately formulated.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1523/jneurosci.1776-08.2008
发表时间:
2008-10-01
期刊:
The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience
影响因子:
--
作者:
Bressler SL;Tang W;Sylvester CM;Shulman GL;Corbetta M
通讯作者:
Corbetta M
DOI:
10.1093/cercor/bhp284
发表时间:
2010-09
期刊:
Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)
影响因子:
--
作者:
Biswal BB;Eldreth DA;Motes MA;Rypma B
通讯作者:
Rypma B
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.0308538101
发表时间:
2004-06-29
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
Brovelli, A;Ding, MZ;Bressler, SL
通讯作者:
Bressler, SL
影响因子:
5.7
作者:
Deshpande, Gopikrishna;Sathian, K.;Hu, Xiaoping
通讯作者:
Hu, Xiaoping
DOI:
10.1016/s0926-6410(01)00037-4
发表时间:
2001-08-01
期刊:
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH
影响因子:
--
作者:
Evdokimidis, I;Smyrnis, N;Papageorgiou, C
通讯作者:
Papageorgiou, C