Diary Study on Japanese University Students’ Suspicions of Being Deceived in Everyday Life
Diary Study on Japanese University Students’ Suspicions of Being Deceived in Everyday Life
复制标题
日本大学生日常生活中被骗疑虑的日记研究
DOI：
10.1080/10510974.2021.1975147
复制
发表时间：
2021
影响因子：
1.6
通讯作者：
Daiku Yasuhiro
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Murai Jun’ichiro;Daiku Yasuhiro
人们如何“怀疑”谎言？我们对日本的大学生进行了一项研究，使用日记的方法来调查人们被欺骗的情况。我们还创建了一个怀疑来源的分类，并检查行为线索或非行为证据是否更经常被用来产生对被欺骗的怀疑。参与者被指示使用录音机记录他们对被欺骗的怀疑一周。结果表明，被试平均每天感知谎言的次数为1.52次。共244集主观感知的谎言分为十类。结果表明，非行为证据（即，“关于特定人的先验知识”、“决定性证据”、“暗示性证据”）更有可能引发怀疑。进一步的分析表明，行为线索经常与其他类别一起使用。
How do people “suspect” lies? We conducted a study on Japanese university students using the diary method to investigate situations in which people are deceived. We also created a taxonomy of sources of suspicion and examined whether behavioral cues or non-behavioral evidence were more frequently used to develop suspicions about being deceived. Participants were instructed to record their suspicions of being deceived for one week using a voice recorder. Results indicated that the mean number of perceived lies was 1.52 per day. A total of 244 episodes of subjectively perceived lies were classified into ten categories. The results indicated that, rather than behavioral cues, non-behavioral evidence (i.e., “Prior Knowledge about a Specific Person,” “Decisive Evidence,” “Suggestive Evidence”) is more likely to trigger suspicion. Further analysis revealed that behavioral cues were often used with other categories.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
Park, HS;Levine, TR;Ferrara, M
通讯作者：
Ferrara, M
影响因子：
2.1
作者：
Serota, Kim B.;Levine, Timothy R.
通讯作者：
Levine, Timothy R.
受骗：真理默认理论以及谎言和欺骗的社会科学
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
T. Levine
通讯作者：
T. Levine
人们如何真正怀疑和发现谎言
影响因子：
2.1
作者：
E. Novotny;Z. Carr;M. Frank;S. Dietrich;Timothy Shaddock;Megan E. Cardwell;Andrea Decker
通讯作者：
Andrea Decker
日本年轻人日常生活中的欺骗行为：重新分析
DOI：
10.1007/s44202-021-00018-y
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
Discover Psychology
影响因子：
--
作者：
Murai Jun’ichiro;Daiku Yasuhiro
通讯作者：
Daiku Yasuhiro