Are Exclusive e-Cigarette Users Unique? Comparing Predictors of Exclusive e-Cigarette Use with Traditional Tobacco Use and Dual Use among U.S. Adolescents.

Are Exclusive e-Cigarette Users Unique? Comparing Predictors of Exclusive e-Cigarette Use with Traditional Tobacco Use and Dual Use among U.S. Adolescents.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/10826084.2021.1899236
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
2
通讯作者:
Hoyle, Rick H.
Hoyle, Rick H.
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Burnell, Kaitlyn;Kwiatek, Sarah M.;Hoyle, Rick H.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

随着美国青少年使用电子烟的增加,了解其风险因素的必要性变得越来越迫切。如果只使用电子烟的青少年的风险状况与使用传统烟草产品和双重使用者的青少年不同,那么预防和干预工作就需要针对这些差异。在708名青少年的样本中,这项研究比较了与电子烟使用者和传统烟草产品使用者之间更多物质使用相关的个人,同伴和家庭风险因素。独家电子烟使用者和传统烟草产品使用者与非使用者相比有许多共同的风险因素。其他分析将独家电子烟使用者与独家传统烟草使用者和双重使用者进行了比较,并出现了一些差异。较低的朋友(OR = 0.28,99%CI [0.12,0.67])和同伴电子烟使用(OR = 0.26,99%CI [0.13,0.52])以及更大的朋友吸烟(OR = 2.17,99%CI [1.23,3.83])预测与独家电子烟使用者相比,独家传统烟草使用者的几率更高。较低的SES(OR = 0.67,99%CI [0.51,0.90]),更大的朋友(OR = 2.68,99%CI [1.56,4.59])和同龄人吸烟(OR = 1.91,99%CI [1.17,3.13])预测与独家电子烟用户相比,双重用户的几率更大。虽然电子烟使用者和传统烟草使用者之间存在一些差异,但他们的风险状况基本相同。针对传统烟草产品的预防和干预工作可以指导针对电子烟使用和双重用途的工作。
As e-cigarette use rises among U.S. adolescents, the need to understand its risk factors becomes increasingly urgent. If the risk profile of adolescents who exclusively use e-cigarettes differs from those who use traditional tobacco products and dual users, prevention and intervention efforts would need to target such differences. In a sample of 708 adolescents, this study compared individual, peer, and family risk factors that are classically associated with greater substance use between exclusive e-cigarette users and traditional tobacco product users. Exclusive e-cigarette users and traditional tobacco product users share many risk factors when compared to non-users. Additional analyses compared exclusive e-cigarette users to exclusive traditional tobacco users and dual users, with some differences emerging. Lower friend (OR = 0.28, 99% CI [0.12, 0.67]) and peer e-cigarette use (OR = 0.26, 99% CI [0.13, 0.52]), and greater friend cigarette smoking (OR = 2.17, 99% CI [1.23, 3.83]) predicted higher odds of being an exclusive traditional tobacco user compared to an exclusive e-cigarette user. Lower SES (OR = 0.67, 99% CI [0.51, 0.90]), and greater friend (OR = 2.68, 99% CI [1.56, 4.59]) and peer cigarette smoking (OR = 1.91, 99% CI [1.17, 3.13]) predicted greater odds of being a dual user compared to an exclusive e-cigarette user. Although some differences exist between exclusive e-cigarette users and traditional tobacco users, their risk profiles are generally the same. Prevention and intervention efforts that target traditional tobacco product could guide efforts to target e-cigarette use and dual use.
DOI: 10.1016/s0376-8716(96)01333-6
发表时间: 1997-03-14
影响因子: 4.2
作者:
Mezzich, AC;Tarter, RE;Parks, S
通讯作者: Parks, S
DOI: 10.1080/00223890802634290
发表时间: 2009-01-01
影响因子: 3.4
作者:
Duckworth, Angela Lee;Quinn, Patrick D.
通讯作者: Quinn, Patrick D.
DOI: 10.1177/1073191109351372
发表时间: 2010-03
期刊: Assessment
影响因子: 3.8
作者:
Zapolski TC;Stairs AM;Settles RF;Combs JL;Smith GT
通讯作者: Smith GT
DOI: 10.1037/a0015808
发表时间: 2009-10-01
影响因子: 1.5
作者:
Ferguson, Christopher J.
通讯作者: Ferguson, Christopher J.
DOI: 10.1007/s11121-017-0825-x
发表时间: 2018-08-01
期刊: PREVENTION SCIENCE
影响因子: 3.5
作者:
Kristjansson, Alfgeir L.;Mann, Michael J.;Sigfusdottir, Inga Dora
通讯作者: Sigfusdottir, Inga Dora