RIA: The Social and Technological Effects of Unshared Information in Divergent and Convergent Group Decision Making

RIA：发散和趋同群体决策中不共享信息的社会和技术影响

• 批准号: 9309133
• 负责人: Suzanne Weisband
• 金额: $ 8.99万
• 依托单位: University of Arizona
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 项目类别: Standard Grant
• 财政年份: 1993
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 1993-08-15 至 1997-01-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=9309133&HistoricalAwards=false
• 关键词: RIA; Social; Technological; Effects; Unshared

WPCK 2 B P Z Courier 10cpi #| x K x 6 X @ 8 ; X @ HP LaserJet IIISi HPLASIII.PRS x @ , \ , , 7|X @ #| x 2 Z B # X F ` HP LaserJet IIISi HPLASIII.PRS x @ , \ , , 7|X @Courier 10cpi Courier 10cpi (Bold) ? x x x , w x 6 X @ 8 ; X @ ? x x x , x ` B ; X @ 8 ; X @ HP LaserJet III i HPIII.PRS x @ , \ , rX @ #| x 2 2 I 9309133 Weisband ? X This research examines the social and technological factors that lead people using computer based information to share information and solve problems. It also addresses some design questions about new technologies and group work. Conflicting results from the research on computer mediated group decision making are particularly troublesome, not because they exist, but because they are not empirically examined. One stream of research suggests that computer networks "open up" communication and ease coordination in some tasks. A second stream of research suggests that computer communication makes it difficult to regulate interaction and reach consensus. The same technology apparently results in different group behaviors, depending on the kind of task that is performed. The research proposed here will attempt to explore these task and media effects empirically. Using theories from social psychology and group interaction, a series of experiments will be conducted to test the implication that computer supported group work may best be suited for divergent, information sharing tasks, but not well suited for convergent, consensus rea ching tasks. These studies focus particularly on how the distribution of shared and unshared information affects the way in which groups exchange information and solve problems in face to face and computer mediated group decision making. They also replicate and extend previous work on first advocacy and status effects to examine the effects of unshared information on expert behavior in groups.

WPCK 2 B P Z Courier 10cpi#|x K x 6 X@8；X@HP LaserJet IIISi HPLASIII.PRS x@，\，，7|X@#|x 2 Z B#X F`HP LaserJet IIISi HPLASIII.PRS x@，\，，7|X@Courier 10cpi Courier 10cpi(粗体)？X，宽x 6 X@8；X@？X，x`B；X@8；X@HP LaserJet III i HPIII.PRS x@，\，RX@#|x 2 2 I 9309133 Weisband？这项研究考察了导致人们使用基于计算机的信息来共享信息和解决问题的社会和技术因素。它还解决了一些关于新技术和小组工作的设计问题。来自计算机中介的群体决策研究的相互矛盾的结果特别麻烦，不是因为它们的存在，而是因为它们没有经过实证检验。一项研究表明，计算机网络“开启”了沟通，简化了某些任务的协调。另一项研究表明，计算机通信使人们很难规范互动并达成共识。同样的技术显然会导致不同的群体行为，这取决于所执行的任务的类型。本文提出的研究将试图对这些任务和媒体效应进行实证研究。利用社会心理学和群体互动的理论，我们将进行一系列实验，以检验计算机支持的小组工作可能最适合于分散的、信息共享的任务，但不太适合于收敛的、共识的阅读任务。这些研究特别侧重于共享和非共享信息的分布如何影响群体面对面和计算机中介的群体决策中交换信息和解决问题的方式。他们还复制和扩展了以前关于第一次倡导和地位影响的工作，以检查未共享信息对群体中专家行为的影响。