Study on Criteria for Federal Support of Research and Development

联邦支持研究与开发的标准研究

基本信息

  • 批准号:
    9528889
  • 负责人:
  • 金额:
    $ 6.6万
  • 依托单位:
  • 依托单位国家:
    美国
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
  • 财政年份:
    1995
  • 资助国家:
    美国
  • 起止时间:
    1995-10-01 至 1996-09-30
  • 项目状态:
    已结题

项目摘要

DPG SEPTEMBER 26, 1995 Present: A. Petersen, J. Bordogna, M. Cehelsky, M. Clutter, K. Erb, W. Harris, J. Kull, W. Lester, C. Marrett, C. McLindon, K. Rison, C. Sullivan, L. Sundro, J. Sunley, L. Williams Dr. Petersen briefed DPG on the September 12 SMIG meeting. Topics included 1) presentation by J. Moore on plans for the 1996 National Science and Technology Week and a proposed new "youth challenge" program; 2) P. Young briefed the group on NSF's evolving plans for the future of supercomputing; and 3) M. Clutter summarized the efforts to develop a federal research agency-wide young investigators program. SMIG agenda topics for today's meeting includes: PFF; FY 1997 OMB Budget submission; October NSB meeting; and the FY 96 Opportunity Fund. On September 13, Drs. Petersen and Erb met with Bruce Alberts, President, National Academy of Sciences, and others to discuss the Seventh Annual Symposium on Frontiers of Science scheduled for November 2-4, 1995 at the NAS. B. Harris encouraged DPG to attend the upcoming symposium as an excellent mechanism to meet and talk with young investigators. He reported that Germany held its first symposium this summer which was modeled after the NAS symposium. It is expected that NAS will submit a proposal to NSF, as well as other agencies, for future symposia. Dr. Petersen reported that NSF's Proposal Review Process Forum held on September 15. The meeting went well and overall the comments were very positive. Participants included members of all NSF Advisory Committees, with representatives from academia and industry. The group emphasized the importance of NSF program directors in the proposal process and encouraged NSF to continue recruiting the most talented scientists. They also suggested that a study be done on mail review vis a vis panel reviews. A summary of the meeting will be made available when complete. Drs. Petersen and Sullivan reporte d on their September 20-23 trip to Alaska. Visits included the Anchorage School District, University of Alaska, Anchorage, visit to Ilisagvik College, the North Slope Borough School District in Barrow and a tour of NOAA's monitoring station including the UV monitor, the Barrow Environmental Observatory and the ITEX Site. Meetings were also held with President J. Kitka of the Alaska Federation of Natives, the Presidential Awardees for Excellence in Science and Mathematics Education. Drs. Watson, Broadbent and Pyle also attend the site visits. Action: OPP to provide DPG with Fairbanks newspaper article. Drs. Clutter and Harris led a presentation on budget flexibility and the 6 month proposal processing 6 month rule. Budget Allocations: M. Clutter reviewed the current practice at NSF that at the beginning of each fiscal year, BFA provides, for each line item, 75% of the previous year's operating plan. M. Clutter and B. Harris provided comments on the importance of allowing maximum flexibility to make allocations based on scientific needs. They stressed the point that in order to maintain flexibility at the cluster level, division level, and directorate level, managers need the capability to allocate at those levels and the ability to establish reserves. Suggestions on ways to allow for the maximum flexibility included: 1) BFA provide allocations for continuing commitments at the line item level and the balance of the allocation be done at the Division or Directorate level; 2) lower mortgage - lower out year commitments, i.e. reduce out year commitments to 50-55% instead of 65% - make more standard awards; 3) establish divisional/directorate reserves; and 4) establish independent office with 5% of directorate budget from which only standard grants would be made. Proposal Processing - 6 month rule: Dr. Petersen reminded the group that the six month rule has been published as part of NSF's customer service guidelines. It may be that the 6 months is not appropriate for some actions and that we should not be looking at average by unit but looking at percent where we expect to achieve 6 months processing times. She stated that what we don't want to do is short cut quality in those cases where it is difficult to obtain adequate review in 6 months. B. Harris reported that MPS applies the 6 month rule to all unsolicited proposals and that they have made a commitment to have all decisions finalized in 6 months. In those rare case when the 6 month rule cannot be met, programs are required to provide an explanation. In addition, where taking longer than 6 months would result in a funding gap for renewal proposals, programs are required to provide supplemental funding in order to eliminate any gaps. This practice was announced to the community in the MPS June 96 Newsletter. Harris reviewed the data base which has been developed in MPS to track all actions and to provide "what if" scenarios. Efforts are ongoing in MPS to use best practices and have staff work as teams. The allocation of S&E funds has been tied to performance at the Division level. M. Clutter reported that BIO was within the 6 month rule although they had not instituted any special procedures. She works with Division Directors in this area and program directors are no longer holding proposals over for possible future funding. Drs. Lane and Bordogna reported on their attendance at the Learning and Intelligent Systems Workshop held on September 17-19. M. Clutter reported on the Neuroinformatics Workshop held September 19 and 20. She also reported on the U.S. - European Commission Task Force on Biotechnology Research meeting held on September 21 and 22. Clutter co-chairs the task force with P. Fasella, Director General for the Joint Research Center for the Directorate General 12, Science Research and Development of the European Commission. Action: M. Clutter to provide summary of meeting to DPG. L. Williams announced that t he NSTC's Committee on Education and Training report, "A Strategic Planning Document for Meeting the 21st Century" has been released. Copies will be provided to DPG. He distributed a copy of the Alliances for Minority Participation publication entitled, Demonstrating ACCOUNTABILITY in a Diverse Scientific and Technological Workforce. This is the first time this information has been assembled. Statistical information is provided on pages 6, 7, 10, 11 and 12. L. Williams reported on the 1995 National Conference on Diversity held September 22-24, 1995. The conference was attended by over 800 students. In an effort to find a way to involve more students this year's conference was modeled with the idea of concurrent regional conferences which worked fairly well. L. Williams reported that legislation on GOALS 2000 will likely have minimal effect on NSF programs because many of the states have already developed a statewide systemic plan for science and math. L. Williams distributed a draft agenda for NSF's conference, Women & Science: Celebrating Achievements, Charting Challenges to be held December 13-15, 1995. A panel of Assistant Directors, chaired by Dr. Lane will be held on Friday, December 15, 1995. M. Cehelsky distributed and reviewed the agenda for the October 4-6, 1995 NSB meeting. Dr. Anita Jones will join the NSB for lunch on Thursday. Dr. Mary Good and Mr. William Golden will join NSB for dinner on Thursday evening. DPG is invited to both events. J. Kull reported that NSF Bulletin 95-13, Guidance for NSF Awardees in the Event of an NSF Shutdown, has been issued. A question and answer session is scheduled for Wednesday, September 27 at 2:00 pm in room 380. C. McLindon reported that a notice would be released on Friday to staff regarding reporting to work on Monday, with or without a continuing resolution. C. Marrett r
DPG 1995 年 9 月 26 日出席:A. Petersen、J. Bordogna、M. Cehelsky、M. Clutter、K. Erb、W. Harris、J. Kull、W. Lester、C. Marrett、C. McLindon、K. Rison、C. Sullivan、L. Sundro、J. Sunley、L. Williams Petersen 博士向 DPG 介绍了 9 月 12 日举行的 SMIG 会议。 主题包括 1) J. Moore 介绍 1996 年国家科技周计划和拟议的新“青年挑战”计划; 2) P. Young 向小组介绍了 NSF 对超级计算未来的发展计划; 3) M. Clutter 总结了制定联邦研究机构范围的年轻调查员计划的努力。 SMIG 今天会议的议程主题包括:PFF; 1997 财年 OMB 预算提交; 10 月 NSB 会议;和 96 财年机会基金。 9 月 13 日,博士。 Petersen 和 Erb 会见了美国国家科学院院长 Bruce Alberts 等人,讨论了定于 1995 年 11 月 2 日至 4 日在 NAS 举行的第七届科学前沿年度研讨会。 B. Harris 鼓励 DPG 参加即将举行的研讨会,将其视为与年轻研究人员会面和交谈的绝佳机制。 他报告说,德国今年夏天仿照NAS研讨会举办了第一次研讨会。 预计 NAS 将向 NSF 以及其他机构提交一份提案,用于未来的研讨会。 Petersen博士报告说,NSF提案评审流程论坛于9月15日举行。会议进行得很顺利,总体评价非常积极。 与会者包括所有 NSF 咨询委员会的成员以及来自学术界和工业界的代表。 该小组强调了 NSF 项目主管在提案过程中的重要性,并鼓励 NSF 继续招募最有才华的科学家。 他们还建议对邮件审查与小组审查进行研究。 会议摘要将在完成后发布。 博士。彼得森和沙利文报道了他们 9 月 20 日至 23 日的阿拉斯加之行。 访问包括安克雷奇学区、阿拉斯加大学安克雷奇分校、伊利萨维克学院、巴罗北坡自治市学区以及 NOAA 监测站(包括紫外线监测器、巴罗环境观测站和 ITEX 站点)。 还与阿拉斯加原住民联合会主席、科学和数学教育卓越总统奖得主 J. Kitka 举行了会议。 博士。沃森、布罗德本特和派尔也参加了实地考察。 行动:OPP 向 DPG 提供费尔班克斯报纸文章。 博士。 Clutter 和 Harris 主持了关于预算灵活性和 6 个月提案处理 6 个月规则的演讲。 预算分配:M. Clutter 回顾了 NSF 的现行做法,即在每个财政年度开始时,BFA 为每个项目提供上一年运营计划的 75%。 M. Clutter 和 B. Harris 就允许最大灵活性根据科学需求进行分配的重要性发表了评论。 他们强调,为了保持集群级、部门级、首长级的灵活性,管理者需要有这些级别的配置能力和建立储备的能力。 关于实现最大灵活性的建议包括: 1) 博鳌亚洲论坛为细目级别的持续承诺提供拨款,并在司或局级别完成分配的平衡; 2) 降低抵押贷款 - 降低年度承诺,即将年度承诺减少至 50-55%,而不是 65% - 制定更多标准奖励; 3) 建立部门/董事会储备金; 4) 设立独立办公室,其预算占董事会预算的5%,仅从中发放标准拨款。 提案处理 - 6 个月规则:Petersen 博士提醒小组,六个月规则已作为 NSF 客户服务指南的一部分发布。 6 个月可能不适合某些操作,我们不应该查看单位的平均值,而应该查看我们期望实现 6 个月处理时间的百分比。 她表示,我们不想做的是在那些难以在 6 个月内获得充分审查的情况下走捷径。 B. Harris 报告称,MPS 对所有主动提出的提案适用 6 个月规则,并且他们已承诺在 6 个月内完成所有决定。 在无法满足 6 个月规则的极少数情况下,项目需要提供解释。 此外,如果时间超过 6 个月会导致续订提案出现资金缺口,则项目需要提供补充资金以消除任何缺口。 这一做法已在 MPS 96 月通讯中向社区公布。 Harris 审查了 MPS 中开发的数据库,用于跟踪所有操作并提供“假设”场景。 MPS 正在努力采用最佳实践并让员工团队合作。 科学与教育资金的分配与部门一级的绩效挂钩。 M. Clutter 报告称,BIO 处于 6 个月规则之内,尽管他们没有制定任何特殊程序。 她与该领域的部门主管合作,项目主管不再对未来可能的资助提出建议。 博士。 Lane 和 Bordogna 报告了他们参加 9 月 17 日至 19 日举行的学习和智能系统研讨会的情况。 M. Clutter 报告了 9 月 19 日至 20 日举行的神经信息学研讨会。她还报告了 9 月 21 日至 22 日举行的美国-欧盟委员会生物技术研究工作组会议。Clutter 与欧盟委员会科学研究与发展第 12 总局联合研究中心主任 P. Fasella 共同主持该工作组。 行动:M. Clutter 向 DPG 提供会议摘要。 L. Williams 宣布,NSTC 教育培训委员会报告《迎接 21 世纪的战略规划文件》已经发布。 副本将提供给 DPG。 他分发了一份少数族裔参与联盟出版物,题为《在多元化的科技劳动力中展示问责制》。 这是第一次收集此类信息。 第 6、7、10、11 和 12 页提供了统计信息。L. Williams 报道了 1995 年 9 月 22 日至 24 日举行的 1995 年全国多样性会议。该会议有 800 多名学生参加。 为了找到一种让更多学生参与的方法,今年的会议采用了并发区域会议的想法,效果相当好。 L. Williams 报告称,GOALS 2000 的立法可能对 NSF 项目的影响微乎其微,因为许多州已经制定了全州范围内的科学和数学系统计划。 L. Williams 分发了将于 1995 年 12 月 13 日至 15 日举行的 NSF 会议“妇女与科学:庆祝成就、描绘挑战”的议程草案。由 Lane 博士主持的助理主任小组将于 1995 年 12 月 15 日星期五举行。M. Cehelsky 分发并审查了 1995 年 10 月 4 日至 6 日举行的 NSB 会议的议程。 Anita Jones 博士将于周四与 NSB 共进午餐。 玛丽·古德博士和威廉·戈尔登先生将于周四晚上与 NSB 共进晚餐。 DPG 受邀参加这两项活动。 J. Kull 报告称,NSF 公告 95-13《NSF 停工事件中 NSF 获奖者指南》已发布。 问答环节定于 9 月 27 日星期三下午 2:00 在 380 室举行。C. McLindon 报告称,周五将向员工发布有关周一上班的通知,无论是否有持续解决方案。 C.马雷特

项目成果

期刊论文数量(0)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)

数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}

{{ item.title }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.author }}

数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}

Norman Metzger其他文献

Norman Metzger的其他文献

{{ item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
  • DOI:
    {{ item.doi }}
  • 发表时间:
    {{ item.publish_year }}
  • 期刊:
  • 影响因子:
    {{ item.factor }}
  • 作者:
    {{ item.authors }}
  • 通讯作者:
    {{ item.author }}

{{ truncateString('Norman Metzger', 18)}}的其他基金

Mathematical Sciences: Streghtening the Linkage Between the Sciences and Mathematics
数学科学:加强科学与数学之间的联系
  • 批准号:
    9703610
  • 财政年份:
    1997
  • 资助金额:
    $ 6.6万
  • 项目类别:
    Continuing Grant
Annual Symposium on Frontiers of Science
科学前沿年度研讨会
  • 批准号:
    9526496
  • 财政年份:
    1995
  • 资助金额:
    $ 6.6万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
Widening the Dialogue for the Future Environment of the Physical and Mathematical Sciences
扩大物理和数学科学未来环境的对话
  • 批准号:
    9415434
  • 财政年份:
    1994
  • 资助金额:
    $ 6.6万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
Polymer Science and Engineering: The Shifting Research Frontier
高分子科学与工程:不断变化的研究前沿
  • 批准号:
    9122680
  • 财政年份:
    1992
  • 资助金额:
    $ 6.6万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
Annual National Symposium on Frontiers of Science, November 7-9, 1991, Arnold and Mabel Beckman Center, Irvine, CA
年度国家科学前沿研讨会,1991 年 11 月 7-9 日,阿诺德和梅布尔贝克曼中心,加州尔湾
  • 批准号:
    9114814
  • 财政年份:
    1991
  • 资助金额:
    $ 6.6万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
Annual National Symposium on Frontiers of Science November 1-3, l990, Irvine, CA
年度国家科学前沿研讨会 1990 年 11 月 1 日至 3 日,加利福尼亚州尔湾
  • 批准号:
    9015979
  • 财政年份:
    1990
  • 资助金额:
    $ 6.6万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
Partial Support for the Board on Chemical Sciences and Technology
对化学科学与技术委员会的部分支持
  • 批准号:
    8914331
  • 财政年份:
    1989
  • 资助金额:
    $ 6.6万
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant

相似海外基金

Universal Model Selection Criteria for Scientific Machine Learning
科学机器学习的通用模型选择标准
  • 批准号:
    DE240100144
  • 财政年份:
    2024
  • 资助金额:
    $ 6.6万
  • 项目类别:
    Discovery Early Career Researcher Award
Data-driven phenotyping of central disorders of hypersomnolence with unsupervised clustering: toward more reliable diagnostic criteria
无监督聚类的数据驱动的中枢性嗜睡症表型分析:寻求更可靠的诊断标准
  • 批准号:
    481046
  • 财政年份:
    2023
  • 资助金额:
    $ 6.6万
  • 项目类别:
Development of collection and preservation criteria and search terms for 'folk material': from factory parts to diaries
制定“民间材料”的收集和保存标准以及搜索术语:从工厂零件到日记
  • 批准号:
    23K00959
  • 财政年份:
    2023
  • 资助金额:
    $ 6.6万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
Developing Information Criteria for Modern Statistics
制定现代统计信息标准
  • 批准号:
    23H00809
  • 财政年份:
    2023
  • 资助金额:
    $ 6.6万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
Collaborative Research: Engaging students in discourse about criteria for judging scientific models
合作研究:让学生参与讨论科学模型的判断标准
  • 批准号:
    2300831
  • 财政年份:
    2023
  • 资助金额:
    $ 6.6万
  • 项目类别:
    Continuing Grant
Developing and Evaluating Criteria for Awarding Digital Badges to Visualize Future Faculty' Teaching Experience
制定和评估授予数字徽章的标准,以可视化未来教师的教学经验
  • 批准号:
    23K02682
  • 财政年份:
    2023
  • 资助金额:
    $ 6.6万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
Multi-criteria decision analysis using 1000Minds to develop consensus weights for classification criteria for scleroderma renal crisis
使用 1000Minds 进行多标准决策分析,制定硬皮病肾危象分类标准的共识权重
  • 批准号:
    487943
  • 财政年份:
    2023
  • 资助金额:
    $ 6.6万
  • 项目类别:
    Miscellaneous Programs
Establishment of Evaluation Criteria by Simplified Mastication Using Ultrasonic Diagnostic Equipment
利用超声波诊断设备建立简化咀嚼评价标准
  • 批准号:
    23K16099
  • 财政年份:
    2023
  • 资助金额:
    $ 6.6万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists
Establishment of new maxillofacial morphology evaluation criteria in patients with HFM
新的HFM患者颌面部形态学评估标准的建立
  • 批准号:
    23K16127
  • 财政年份:
    2023
  • 资助金额:
    $ 6.6万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists
Realization of Quantitatively Evaluation Criteria for Atypia based on Morphological Features of Cellular Tissue towards the Construction of Morphology in Malignant Lymphoma
实现基于细胞组织形态特征的异型性定量评价标准,构建恶性淋巴瘤形态学
  • 批准号:
    23KJ1141
  • 财政年份:
    2023
  • 资助金额:
    $ 6.6万
  • 项目类别:
    Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows
{{ showInfoDetail.title }}

作者:{{ showInfoDetail.author }}

知道了