Doctoral Dissertation Research:Sources of Legitimation and the Formation and Flexibility of Group Routines

博士论文研究：合法性的来源与群体惯例的形成和灵活性

• 批准号: 0101260
• 负责人: Jane Sell
• 金额: $ 0.75万
• 依托单位: Texas A&M Research Foundation
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 项目类别: Standard Grant
• 财政年份: 2001
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2001-06-01 至 2003-05-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=0101260&HistoricalAwards=false
• 关键词: Doctoral; Dissertation; Research; Sources; Legitimation

Social psychologists argue that individuals create social structures through interaction with others, and that these structures in turn serve to shape, constrain, or enable future interaction. However, the nature of the kinds of group structures and decision-making that emerge depend on the sources of group legitimation. For example, group legitimacy may come externally from the larger organization, or it may come internally from its own beliefs systems. This project examines how different sources of legitimation make groups more or less hierarchical in their decision-making, and more or less flexible in their routine interactions. To address these questions, it uses experimental methods involving subjects brought together to interact in a group project. The independent variable is authorization by the researcher (i.e., external legitimation) or endorsement by the group (i.e., internal legitimation). The dependent variables are the group's adherence to routines over two different types of tasks it is asked to complete, and the patterns of observable power and prestige that emerge in the groups' interactions. Along with evaluating theories of legitimation, the results provide valuable information for organizations concerned with implementing team or group decision-making structures.

社会心理学家认为，个人通过与他人的互动创造社会结构，而这些结构反过来又有助于塑造，约束或实现未来的互动。 然而，各种群体结构和决策的性质取决于群体合法性的来源。 例如，群体合法性可能来自外部的大组织，也可能来自内部的信仰体系。 这个项目探讨了合法性的不同来源如何使群体在决策中或多或少地具有等级性，以及在日常互动中或多或少地具有灵活性。 为了解决这些问题，它使用实验方法，涉及的主题聚集在一起，在一个小组项目中进行互动。 自变量是研究者的授权（即，外部合法化）或由团体认可（即，内部合法化）。 因变量是群体在两种不同类型的任务中对常规的坚持，以及在群体互动中出现的可观察到的权力和威望的模式。 沿着评价理论的合法性，结果提供了有价值的信息，实施团队或群体决策结构的组织有关。