课题基金 / 基金详情

Cognitive Bases of Hindsight Effects

Cognitive Bases of Hindsight Effects
事后诸葛亮效应的认知基础
批准号:
0548605
负责人:
Hal Arkes
金额:
$11.44万
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
Continuing Grant
财政年份:
2006
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2006-07-01 至 2009-06-30

项目摘要

项目成果

Hal Arkes的其他基金

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
Hindsight bias is characterized by an exaggerated belief, following the occurrence of an event, that one could have predicted it beforehand. This 'Monday morning quarterbacking' has been found to compromise judgment in a large variety of domains including medicine, law, and accounting. For example, physicians who learn a correct diagnosis significantly exaggerate the likelihood that they could have arrived at that diagnosis. This bias interferes with learning. A physician who is able to recognize that he or she might not have made a correct diagnosis will be more willing to attend to the lessons to be learned from a difficult case.This research addresses the causes of the hindsight bias. A hypothesized cause is the increased 'fluency' of cognitive processing that occurs when a correct answer is revealed or an event that has occurred. For example, if X occurs, I spend some time thinking about X. When asked whether I would have predicted that X, Y, or Z would occur, the augmented processing done on X makes its fluency higher than that for Y or Z. To test whether heightened fluency causes hindsight bias, I manipulate fluency by some unorthodox means and then assess the magnitude of the hindsight bias. For example, in one study the visual clarity of a printed statement will be manipulated. The statement will be truthfully labeled as either 'true' or 'false.' Subjects will be asked whether they would have rated the statement as true or false if they had not been told the actual truth status. I predict that when statements are printed less clearly they will produce less of a hindsight effect, because the unclear presentation will lower the fluency with which they are processed.Another group of experiments will test whether people more knowledgeable about a topic are less able to quarantine new knowledge about that topic compared to those less knowledgeable. For example, a professor must ignore much of his or her knowledge in order to teach the novices taking a class. This is similar to the hindsight bias: in hindsight-bias situations, a person must ignore knowledge about outcomes in order to make accurate assessments. In the professor's situation, he or she must ignore content knowledge. I will examine the conditions that enable people to perform this task more or less successfully.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
RAPID: Testing Important Judgment/Decision Making Phenomena in the High-Incentive Context of Covid-19: The Understanding of Physicians and Laypersons
  • 批准号:
    2029857
  • 项目类别:
    Standard Grant
  • 资助金额:
    $8.67万
  • 财政年份:
    2020
  • 负责人:
    Hal Arkes
  • 依托单位:
EITM: Collaborative Research: Reference Point Adaptation and Mental Accounting: Dynamic Extensions of Prospect Theory
Collaborative Research: The Reluctance to Use Decision Aids
Using Scientific Materials to Compare Disaggregated Versus Holistic Ratings
海外基金