Ideology and International Terrorism: Types of Terrorism and Their Structural Determinants

意识形态与国际恐怖主义：恐怖主义的类型及其结构性决定因素

• 批准号: 0617980
• 负责人: Edward Crenshaw
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Ohio State University Research Foundation -DO NOT USE
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 项目类别: Standard Grant
• 财政年份: 2006
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2006-08-01 至 2009-07-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=0617980&HistoricalAwards=false
• 关键词: Ideology; International; Terrorism; Types; Their

SES 0617980PI: Edward M. CrenshawOhio State UniversityIdeology and International Terrorism: Types of Terrorism and Their Structural DeterminantsABSTRACTHow different are ideologically-driven types of international terrorism? Do different ideological forms of terrorism arise from different social causes? Do methods and targets differ as well? Applying major theories of political violence to large, preexisting datasets on international terrorism, this research will explore Leftist, Islamic, Rightist and Ethnonationalist terrorism in terms of: 1) their relative prevalence over the last 30 years, and 2) their differences in terms of social causation, with in-depth investigation of differences in the number of attacks, lethality, attack location, and specific targets. Using the ITERATE dataset and, for comparative purposes, the RAND dataset, we address these questions by conducting three major analyses: (1) global time-series analyses where we investigate the influence of world conditions (e.g., economic cycles) on total and ideological types of international terrorism; (2) cross-sectional pooled time-series analyses where we investigate the national production of different forms of terrorist attacks, their lethality, their regional targets, and the national locations of these attacks; and (3) (using RAND data for comparative purposes) an assessment of bias in news reporting given national levels of press freedom, the presence of international media bureaus, and economic development. The main goal from a social scientific point of view is to evaluate the usefulness of major theoretical perspectives (e.g., social disorganization, the clash of civilizations) in studying international terrorism, with the ultimate aim of producing a more comprehensive theory of political violence. At a broader level, this research project should inform public policies in a number of ways. Foremost, any increase in our ability to predict general patterns of international terrorism aids in deterrence and preparedness. Further, a more detailed understanding of the social forces that shape unconventional political violence will improve the targeting and efficacy of both public and private interventions.

SES 0617980PI：Edward M. Crenshaw俄亥俄州立大学意识形态与国际恐怖主义：恐怖主义的类型及其结构性决定因素摘要意识形态驱动的国际恐怖主义类型有何不同？ 不同的意识形态形式的恐怖主义是否源于不同的社会原因？ 方法和目标是否也不同？ 将政治暴力的主要理论应用于大型的，预先存在的国际恐怖主义数据集，本研究将探讨左翼，伊斯兰，右翼和民族主义恐怖主义：1）在过去30年中的相对流行率，以及2）他们在社会原因方面的差异，深入调查袭击次数，致命性，袭击地点和具体目标的差异。 使用ITERATE数据集和兰德数据集（出于比较目的），我们通过进行三个主要分析来解决这些问题：（1）全球时间序列分析，我们调查世界条件的影响（例如，（2）跨部门汇总时间序列分析，我们在其中调查不同形式的恐怖主义袭击的国家生产、其致命性、其区域目标以及这些袭击的国家地点;以及（3）（使用兰德公司的数据进行比较）根据各国的新闻自由水平评估新闻报道中的偏见，国际媒体局的存在和经济发展。 从社会科学的角度来看，主要目标是评估主要理论观点的有用性（例如，社会解体、文明冲突），最终目的是提出一个更全面的政治暴力理论。 在更广泛的层面上，这一研究项目应该以多种方式为公共政策提供信息。 最重要的是，我们预测国际恐怖主义一般模式的能力的任何提高都有助于威慑和防备。 此外，更详细地了解形成非常规政治暴力的社会力量，将提高公共和私人干预的针对性和效力。