Doctoral Dissertation Research: Finding the Common Place of Anti-Doping. An Ethnographic Case Study of Legal Consciousness in New Zealand.

鉴于最近发生了知名运动员为提高运动成绩而使用兴奋剂的丑闻，公众对体育运动中“兴奋剂”的监管和制裁的认识有所提高。根据定义，兴奋剂包括运动员使用的任何被认为不道德或破坏体育运动公平竞争环境的提高成绩的方法。为了规范和阻止使用兴奋剂，《世界反兴奋剂条例》概述了反兴奋剂程序的国际标准，而世界反兴奋剂机构（WADA），一个国际非政府组织，则确保这些标准的实施。虽然这些机制被认为是替代性争端解决方式，但反兴奋剂规则模仿了法律的某些方面，甚至有时表现为法律。违规行为通常会导致停赛，可能会持续数年，可能会结束运动员的职业生涯，有时还会导致刑事指控。鉴于这些处罚，已经建立了仲裁机制，以审理违禁物质检测呈阳性的运动员的上诉，本研究通过研究在新西兰体育法庭出庭的运动员的仲裁听证会，探讨反兴奋剂做法的影响。体育法庭具有独特的地位，因为它是一个独立的国家机构，由具有法律和体育专业知识的成员组成，负责裁决体育部门的争端，包括违反反兴奋剂规定的行为。通过观察会议和采访的法庭成员，运动员，律师代表运动员，体育管理人员，本论文的研究探讨了仲裁过程中的反兴奋剂法规与法律和其他规则的含义在体育。由于这些类似法律的做法表明了一种更广泛的全球趋势，即非政府组织采取行动改变和规范社会惯例，往往是对法律无法在特定竞技场内提供补救或援助的反应，因此这项研究的意义不仅限于体育领域。

In light of recent scandals regarding drug use by high-profile athletes to enhance their sport performance, there is heightened public awareness of the regulation of and sanctioning of "doping" in sport. By definition, doping encompasses any performance enhancing methods used by athletes that are considered unethical or undermine a level playing field in sport. In the attempt to regulate and deter doping, the World Anti-Doping Code outlines the international standards for anti-doping procedures, while the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), an international nongovernmental organization, ensures their implementation. Though these mechanisms are considered forms of alternative dispute resolution, anti-doping rules mimic aspects of law, even at times taking on the appearance of law. Violations often lead to suspensions that can last for years, potentially ending an athlete's career and sometimes leading to criminal charges. In light of these punishments, arbitration mechanisms have been established to hear the appeals of athletes who have tested positive for banned substances.This research examines the implications of anti-doping practices by studying the arbitration hearings of athletes who appear before the Sports Tribunal of New Zealand. The Sports Tribunal is uniquely positioned, because it is an independent national body, made up of members with specialties in law and sport, which determines disputes for the sports sector, including anti-doping violations. Through observations of meetings and interviews with tribunal members, athletes, lawyers who represent athletes, and sports administrators, this dissertation research examines the arbitration process and the meanings attributed to anti-doping codes versus law and other rules in sport. As these law-like practices are indicative of a broader global trend in which nongovernmental organizations act to change and regulate social practices, often in reaction to law's inability to provide remedy or assistance within a specific arena, the significance of this research is not limited to sporting contexts.