Europeanization of higher education: Between global knowledge society and national traditions

高等教育的欧洲化：全球知识社会与民族传统之间

• 批准号: 200984353
• 负责人: Professor Dr. Richard Münch
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Seniorprofessur für Gesellschaftstheorie und komparative Makrosoziologie
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Units
• 财政年份: 2012
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2011-12-31 至 2019-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/200984353?language=en
• 关键词: Europeanization; higher; education; Between; global

The opening of national, hierarchically structured academic fields goes hand in hand with an Europeanization of academic capitalism: The inequality in terms of researchers, disciplines and universities is increasingly subjected to heightened competition. The institutionalization on a European level accounts for few, though globally visible winners. The theoretical surplus of the research project so far is mainly rooted in a transnational conception of the academic field within the field of power, enabling a both horizontal and comparative perspective on specific national features. This perspective allows for a deeper understanding of the process of the symbolic construction of the European research area (ERA). By analyzing the interplay between national opening and European closure, several findings were gained: On the micro- and meso levels, in particular, a variety of transnational strategies concerning career, third-party funding and respective cooperation have developed, indicating an academic modus operandi that becomes increasingly Europeanized. However, the genesis of an ERA also involves potential conflicts: Based on our current results, further analysis needs to focus especially on transnational academic migration, effects of "brain-drain" and the emergence of a European academic elite.

国家层次结构的学术领域的开放与学术资本主义的欧洲化齐头并进：研究人员、学科和大学方面的不平等日益受到激烈竞争的影响。欧洲层面的制度化虽然在全球范围内可见，但几乎没有赢家。迄今为止，该研究项目的理论过剩主要源于权力领域内学术领域的跨国概念，从而能够从横向和比较的角度来看待特定的国家特征。这种视角可以更深入地理解欧洲研究区（ERA）的符号构建过程。通过分析国家开放与欧洲封闭之间的相互作用，我们得到了一些发现：特别是在微观和中观层面上，各种涉及职业、第三方资助和各自合作的跨国战略已经发展起来，表明学术运作方式日益欧洲化。然而，ERA的起源也存在潜在的冲突：根据我们目前的结果，进一步的分析需要特别关注跨国学术移民、“人才流失”的影响以及欧洲学术精英的出现。