Doctoral Dissertation Research in DRMS: Who's at stake? Nonhuman agency concepts and cultural resource conflict among Indigenous and Western actors in Panama

DRMS 中的博士论文研究：谁处于危险之中？

• 批准号: 1427035
• 负责人: Douglas Medin
• 金额: $ 2.57万
• 依托单位: Northwestern University
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 项目类别: Standard Grant
• 财政年份: 2014
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2014-08-01 至 2017-07-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1427035&HistoricalAwards=false
• 关键词: Doctoral; Dissertation; Research; DRMS; Who

This research engages a fundamental question for cognitive science and decision making: what is at stake in cultural resource conflict over human-environment interactions? One of the most fundamental concepts under debate involves what-or-who is at stake in environmental dilemmas. Understanding people's environmental behavior requires understanding how they relate to other life forms as intentional agents worthy of moral consideration. This interdisciplinary research investigates how concepts of nonhuman agency interrelate with environmental cognition and decision making across two communities living in a shared ecosystem: Indigenous Ngöbe and mainstream (Ladino, Euro-American) actors in Bocas del Toro, Panama (also including selected comparisons to standard U.S. samples). Studies employ cognitive and psychological methods to target key predictions concerning cultural variation in nonhuman agency concepts, and associated reasoning about moral circles and ecological causation. It is predicted that cultural differences in cognition will lead individuals to approach environmental decision making in very different ways: either as an ecological question that positions humans as users and protectors of the environment, or as a social question that positions both humans and nonhumans as intentional stakeholders in shared community.This dissertation research will advance cognitive theory by offering a novel analysis of the conceptual frameworks involved in reasoning about nature across cultures, providing insight into the moral and causal dimensions of ecological thought. A distinct advantage of this work is its focus on under-represented perspectives of indigenous communities, contributing to the diversity of social science study populations and offering a unique vantage point on environmental questions. By documenting how cultural concepts and values impact perceptions of environmental tradeoffs, this research sheds light on cultural resource conflict (and cooperation) between indigenous and mainstream groups. More broadly, the results will deepen knowledge about the cultural and cognitive factors underlying environmental decision making, speaking to core issues in the decision science of human-environment interactions.

这项研究涉及认知科学和决策的一个基本问题：人类与环境相互作用的文化资源冲突的利害关系是什么？争论中最基本的概念之一涉及环境困境中什么或谁受到威胁。要理解人们的环境行为，就需要理解他们作为值得道德考虑的有意识的行为者与其他生命形式的关系。这项跨学科的研究调查了非人类机构的概念如何与生活在共享生态系统中的两个社区的环境认知和决策相互关联：土著Ngöbe和巴拿马博卡斯德尔托罗的主流（Ladino，欧美）演员（还包括与标准美国样本的选定比较）。研究采用认知和心理学的方法，以针对非人类机构概念的文化差异的关键预测，以及有关道德圈和生态因果关系的相关推理。据预测，认知的文化差异将导致个人以非常不同的方式进行环境决策：要么是一个生态问题，将人类定位为环境的使用者和保护者，本论文的研究将通过对概念框架的新颖分析来推进认知理论参与跨文化的自然推理，提供对生态思想的道德和因果维度的洞察。这项工作的一个明显优势是它关注土著社区代表性不足的观点，有助于社会科学研究人群的多样性，并为环境问题提供了独特的Vantage地位。通过记录文化概念和价值观如何影响对环境权衡的看法，这项研究揭示了土著和主流群体之间的文化资源冲突（与合作）。更广泛地说，研究结果将加深对环境决策背后的文化和认知因素的了解，涉及人类与环境相互作用决策科学中的核心问题。