Doctoral Dissertation Research: Indigenous Ontologies of Land and Land Politics: A Critical Analysis of Forest Rights Legislation

这项博士论文研究将考察国家和土著人民对土地和土地权的不同本体论(概念化)，以更充分地了解土地冲突及其可能的解决方案。在因国家主导的发展举措而流离失所的人中，土著人民占了相当大的比例，但由于他们与特定土地的历史联系，他们经常拒绝替代土地作为补偿。他们的意识形态赋予特定的具有社会生态意义的土地以价值，导致复杂和多样的土地使用模式和行为，政策制定者往往难以辨认，并使他们与国家发生冲突。通过对2006年印度《森林权法案》的个案研究，该项目将调查不同的土地和土地权的本体论如何影响不同社区的土地政策的执行。各国如何界定土地权？土著社区如何理解他们与特定土地的关系？土地和土地权的不同本体论如何影响土地政策、冲突和谈判？通过丰富目前对本体论与围绕土地的政治实践之间的联系的理解，这项研究的发现可以在不同的背景下对土地、发展和环境政策产生积极的影响，同时在理论上对政治生态学、关键发展研究、环境理论、可持续性研究以及土著和非殖民化研究做出贡献。这项研究将在印度喀拉拉邦的两个土著(Adivasi)社区进行，这两个社区继续因发展项目而流离失所，同时通过森林和土地保护政策，特别是《林权法案》(FRA)，成为林地的合法居民。《法兰克福汇报》历来是承认各种公共土地权的修复性立法，但自2009年实施以来未能防止被剥夺。虽然阿迪瓦什人表达了土地的社会生态本体论，但国家对土地作为财产/资源表达了不同的理解，两者的相遇在历史上导致了冲突。为了试图了解这一冲突并建立缓解未来冲突的工具，本研究将审查实施《法兰克福汇报》的政治进程，以：a)审查阿迪瓦西斯的基本本体论假设和信仰；b)确定这些本体论是否以及如何转化为政治实践；以及c)说明阿迪瓦西关于土地的本体论信仰如何与支撑《法兰克福汇报》的印度政府的本体论信仰汇聚和背离。将利用叙事访谈、参与者观察、焦点小组讨论、事件人种学和档案研究的定性分析，在15个村庄和州官员中进行经验性案例研究方法，以回答以下研究问题：关于阿迪瓦西和州土地本体论，法兰克福机场的实施过程揭示了什么？这些不同的土地估价体系是如何在土地使用政策和政治中得到表达的？将对数据进行分析，以辨别阿迪瓦西斯人和国家在阐明他们对土地的不同本体论以及他们对彼此、土地的知识和理解以及他们对彼此的知识和理解时所使用的话语、故事和做法。

This doctoral dissertation study will examine different ontologies (conceptualizations) of land and land rights of states and indigenous peoples to more fully understand conflicts over land and their possible resolution. Indigenous peoples account for a significant proportion of people who are displaced by state-led development initiatives, yet they often refuse alternate lands in compensation because of their historical ties to particular lands. Their ideologies accord value to specific socio-ecologically significant lands, giving rise to complex and multiple land use patterns and behaviors that are often illegible to policy makers and put them in conflict with the State. Through a case study analysis of the 2006 Forest Rights Act of India, this project will investigate how different ontologies of land and land rights impact the implementation of land policy in different communities. How do States frame land rights? How do indigenous communities understand their relationship to specific lands? How do different ontologies of land and land rights shape land policies, conflicts and negotiations? By enriching current understandings of the connection between ontology and political practice surrounding land, the findings of this research can positively impact land, development and environmental policy in various contexts, while contributing theoretically to the fields of political ecology, critical development studies, environmental theory, sustainability studies, and indigenous and decolonial studies. This research will be conducted in two indigenous (Adivasi) communities in Kerala, India that continue to be displaced by development projects, while being simultaneously placed via forest and land conservation policies, specifically, the Forest Rights Act (FRA), as legitimate residents of forestlands. The FRA is historically reparative legislation that recognizes various communal land rights but has failed to prevent dispossession since its implementation in 2009. While the Adivasis express a socio-ecological ontology of land, the State expresses a different understanding of land as property/resource, and the meeting of the two has historically resulted in conflict. In an attempt to understand this conflict and build tools to mitigate future conflicts, this research will examine the political process of implementing the FRA to: a) examine the underlying ontological assumptions and beliefs of the Adivasis; b) determine whether and how these ontologies translate into political practice; and c) illustrate how Adivasi ontological beliefs about land converge and diverge with those of the Indian state that underlie the FRA. An empirical case-study approach utilizing qualitative analysis of narrative interviews, participant observation, focus group discussions, event ethnography and archival research will be conducted in 15 hamlets and with state officials to answer the following research questions: What does the FRA implementation process reveal about Adivasi versus state land ontologies? How have these different systems of valuing land been expressed, or not, in land use policy, and politics? Data will be analyzed to discern the discourses, stories and practices that the Adivasis and the State utilize in articulating their differing ontologies of land, and their knowledge and understanding of each other, land, and their knowledge and understanding of each other.