权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Relationships Between Removal of Infrastructure Subsidies and Coastal Development: The Impact of the U.S. Coastal Barrier Resources Act

取消基础设施补贴与沿海开发之间的关系：美国沿海屏障资源法案的影响

基本信息

批准号：
1660450
负责人：
Todd BenDor
金额：
$ 34.85万
依托单位：
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
依托单位国家：
美国
项目类别：
Continuing Grant
财政年份：
2017
资助国家：
美国
起止时间：
2017-07-01 至 2021-12-31
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1660450&HistoricalAwards=false
关键词：
Relationships Between Removal Infrastructure Subsidies

项目摘要

This research project will determine whether the withdrawal of federal infrastructure subsidies is an effective way to discourage urban development in environmentally fragile or risk-prone areas. The project will use the 1982 U.S. Coastal Barrier Resources Act (CBRA) as a kind of "natural experiment" to examine how and why rates and type of urban development have differed depending on whether the coastal areas were affected by the act, which eliminated federal funding for infrastructure in designated coastal areas along the East Coast and Gulf of Mexico without prohibiting development. The project will enhance general knowledge about the factors influencing development and redevelopment of coastal areas by identifying the interrelated and conflicting motivations of different organizations involved in the urban development process. It will address theoretical debates about future legal frameworks that could mirror the CBRA to protect wetlands, floodplains, endangered species habitat, and other areas experiencing severe future risk from changing environmental conditions. Project findings will be shared with policy makers and coastal managers through a professional toolkit that will explain results and suggest best practices for coastal development and infrastructure decisions. Findings also will be transformed into educational materials for use in high schools across North Carolina and the U.S. Urban development relies on numerous factors, including federal assistance with infrastructure development, whether through roads, utilities, or other major investments. Although the CBRA attempted to reduce incentives for development in areas that were extremely vulnerable to natural hazards, such as areas subject to hurricanes or storm surges development still has occurred in these areas. The investigators will focus on the key tension created by the CBRA, as increased infrastructure costs may be offset by local permitting and infrastructure funding as well as premiums placed on seclusion promoted by the act. They will seek to ascertain to what extent development has occurred in coastal areas where public infrastructure, disaster relief, and flood insurance subsidies have been withdrawn. They will examine how these development rates compare to coastal areas with continued subsidies, and they will identify whether there are economic or population growth thresholds for which withdrawal of federal funding has no effect on development rates, and they will assess how local land-use, infrastructure, and permitting decisions interact with and possibly offset restrictions on federal subsidies. The investigators will evaluate the rates, types, and intensities of residential development in units affected by the CBRA and adjoining, non-affected areas throughout Alabama, Delaware, Florida, North Carolina, and South Carolina. They will use a quasi-experimental framework based on a matched pair analysis to understand the impacts of various factors. Focused case studies will then explore why some units affected by the CBRA have developed and others have not.

该研究项目将确定取消联邦基础设施补贴是否是阻止环境脆弱或风险易发地区城市发展的有效途径。该项目将使用1982年美国海岸屏障资源法案（CBRA）作为一种“自然实验”，以研究如何以及为什么城市发展的速度和类型会因沿海地区是否受到该法案的影响而有所不同，该法案取消了联邦政府对东海岸和墨西哥湾指定沿海地区基础设施的资助，但没有禁止发展。该项目将通过查明参与城市发展进程的不同组织的相互关联和相互冲突的动机，增进对影响沿海地区发展和再发展的因素的一般了解。它将解决有关未来法律的框架的理论争论，这些框架可以反映CBRA，以保护湿地、洪泛区、濒危物种栖息地以及未来因环境条件变化而面临严重风险的其他地区。将通过一个专业工具包与决策者和沿海管理人员分享项目结果，该工具包将解释结果并提出沿海发展和基础设施决策的最佳做法。调查结果还将转化为教育材料，供北卡罗来纳州和美国的高中使用。城市发展依赖于许多因素，包括联邦对基础设施发展的援助，无论是通过道路、公用事业还是其他重大投资。虽然CBRA试图减少对极易遭受自然灾害的地区的发展激励，例如遭受飓风或风暴潮的地区，但这些地区仍然有发展。调查人员将重点关注CBRA造成的关键紧张局势，因为增加的基础设施成本可能会被当地许可和基础设施资金以及该法案促进的隔离溢价所抵消。他们将设法确定在公共基础设施、救灾和洪水保险补贴被取消的沿海地区，发展的程度。他们将研究这些发展速度如何与持续补贴的沿海地区进行比较，他们将确定是否存在经济或人口增长阈值，联邦资金的撤回对发展速度没有影响，他们将评估当地土地使用，基础设施和许可决定如何与联邦补贴的限制相互作用并可能抵消这些限制。调查人员将评估受CBRA影响的单位以及整个亚拉巴马、特拉华州、佛罗里达、北卡罗来纳州和南卡罗来纳州的相邻非受影响地区的住宅开发的速度、类型和强度。他们将使用基于配对分析的准实验框架来了解各种因素的影响。然后，重点案例研究将探讨为什么一些受CBRA影响的单位得到了发展，而另一些则没有。

项目成果

期刊论文数量（14）

专著数量（0）

科研奖励数量（0）

会议论文数量（0）

专利数量（0）

Floodplain Buyouts and Municipal Finance

DOI：
10.1061/(asce)nh.1527-6996.0000380
发表时间：
2020-08-01
期刊：
NATURAL HAZARDS REVIEW
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
BenDor, Todd K.;Salvesen, David;Ganser, Brooke
通讯作者：
Ganser, Brooke

A Review of Funding Mechanisms for US Floodplain Buyouts

美国洪泛区收购融资机制回顾

DOI：
10.3390/su122310112
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
Sustainability
影响因子：
3.9
作者：
Peterson, Kelsey;Apadula, Emily;Salvesen, David;Hino, Miyuki;Kihslinger, Rebecca;BenDor, Todd K.
通讯作者：
BenDor, Todd K.

Complexities and costs of floodplain buyout implementation

洪泛区买断实施的复杂性和成本