The Sixth Module of the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES)

选举制度比较研究（CSES）第六模块

• 批准号: 1760058
• 负责人: Kenneth Kollman
• 金额: $ 75.62万
• 依托单位: Regents of the University of Michigan - Ann Arbor
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 项目类别: Continuing Grant
• 财政年份: 2018
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2018-08-15 至 2023-07-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1760058&HistoricalAwards=false
• 关键词: Sixth; Module; Comparative; Study; Electoral

The 1990s witnessed a dramatic increase in the number of democracies around the world. The independent watchdog organization Freedom House estimates that as of 2016, nearly two-thirds of the world's countries are electoral democracies, nearly doubling the number of democracies from just two decades earlier. More recent years have witnessed new challenges to the democracies. The largest movements of refugees since World War II, for example, has put great pressure on new and established democracies alike. Will this and other pressures decrease popular satisfaction with democracy? Will it initiate a turn to authoritarian leaders or to populist leaders? The CSES research project, a collaboration of scholars in more than 60 countries, is designed to be able to address these questions and many more that are equally important to science and society. CSES collaborators conduct high quality, nationally representative surveys after elections in their countries. CSES combines these surveys along with additional information about the country and electoral system into a single dataset for use - at no cost - by academics, students, policymakers, journalists, and the public. At nearly 25 years of service to science and society, CSES has already yielded many important results about electoral democracy and is poised to tackle these and other new questions.Freedom House estimates that as of 2016, 123 of the world's 195 countries are electoral democracies, approximately double the number of democracies just two decades earlier. The early twenty-first century, however, has witnessed challenges to the success of this great experiment. One of the largest massive movements of refugees in human history, for example, has put great pressure on new and established democracies alike. How much has this pressure been manifested in increasingly authoritarian leaders (even those elected via democratic procedures) and how much has been manifest in the spread of populism are questions that are ideally suited for study through the CSES. CSES advances the understanding of enduring and fundamental questions about electoral choice. The goals of this unique research program are threefold: to illuminate how societal, political, and economic institutional and structural contexts, most especially electoral institutions, shape the beliefs and behaviors of citizens, thereby conditioning the nature and quality of democratic choice as expressed through popular elections; to understand the nature of political and social cleavages and alignments; and to shed light on how citizens, living under diverse political arrangements, evaluate democratic institutions and processes.This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.

1990年代，全世界民主国家的数目急剧增加。 独立监督组织自由之家估计，截至2016年，世界上近三分之二的国家是选举民主国家，民主国家的数量几乎是20年前的两倍。 近年来，民主国家面临新的挑战。例如，自第二次世界大战以来最大规模的难民流动给新的民主国家和老牌民主国家都带来了巨大压力。 这种压力和其他压力会降低民众对民主的满意度吗？ 它会引发转向威权领导人还是民粹主义领导人？ CSES研究项目是60多个国家学者的合作项目，旨在解决这些问题以及对科学和社会同样重要的更多问题。 CSES合作者在其国家选举后进行高质量的全国代表性调查。 CSES将这些调查与有关国家和选举制度的其他信息沿着组合成一个单一的数据集，供学者、学生、政策制定者、记者和公众免费使用。 在为科学和社会服务的近25年里，CSES已经取得了许多关于选举民主的重要成果，并准备解决这些问题和其他新问题。自由之家估计，截至2016年，世界195个国家中有123个是选举民主国家，大约是20年前民主国家数量的两倍。然而，在21世纪初，这一伟大试验的成功遇到了挑战。例如，人类历史上最大规模的难民流动之一给新的民主国家和已建立的民主国家都带来了巨大压力。这种压力有多少体现在日益独裁的领导人身上（即使是那些通过民主程序选出的领导人），有多少体现在民粹主义的传播中，这些问题非常适合通过CSES进行研究。CSES推进了对选举选择的持久和基本问题的理解。这个独特的研究计划的目标有三个方面：照亮如何社会，政治和经济体制和结构的背景下，特别是选举机构，塑造公民的信仰和行为，从而调节民主选择的性质和质量，通过普选表达;了解政治和社会分裂和结盟的性质;该奖项反映了NSF的法定使命，并被认为值得通过使用基金会的知识价值和更广泛的影响审查标准进行评估来支持。