权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Contemporary political thought in Germany

德国当代政治思想

基本信息

批准号：
245510034
负责人：
Professorin Dr. Tine Stein
金额：
--
依托单位：
Institut für Politikwissenschaft
依托单位国家：
德国
项目类别：
Research Grants
财政年份：
2013
资助国家：
德国
起止时间：
2012-12-31 至 2016-12-31
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/245510034?language=en
关键词：
Contemporary political thought Germany

项目摘要

The research project aims at creating a study of the relevant contributions to contemporary political thought in Germany since 1990. The collected material shall then be discussed under specific considerations of the well-established distinction of political ideologies between Liberalism, Conservatism, Socialism (including Social-Democratic thought) and green political thought. "Political thought" in this context is understood as the sum of all textual statements addressing the public, which claim a certain level of theoretical consistency, reflection and analytical quality and focus on analyzing, criticizing and giving normative guidance to the general political institutions (polity), the processes (politics) and outcomes of politics (policy). The contributions to political thought are further understood as situated between political theories on the one hand and mere public programmatic statements on the other. The time frame in focus is a result of the insight that severe challenges have emerged since 1989/90, such as the erosion of nation-state power in the process of globalization, an increasing trend towards individualization in society and a growing need to further and reconcile ecological and economic goals. We regard books, essays and articles as relevant, which either exceed a certain level of public recognition and that at the same time stand out by advancing the established political ideologies by adapting them to new problems or that rather leave old paradigms behind and open up new directions in political thought. The spectrum of such texts ranges from Botho Strauss' "Anschwellender Bocksgesang" (1993) via Jürgen Habermas' "Die Zukunft der menschlichen Natur" (2001) to Tim Jackson's book "Wohlstand ohne Wachstum" (Prosperity without Growth, 2011). We will collect texts discussing relevant political thought in a multi-dimensional inquiry according to quantitative criteria (sales numbers), qualitative criteria (published lists), through surveys taken among experts and through reviewing of a selection of related journals. The process will reduce the texts to an amount that is accessible to an in-depth analysis that we will then focus on the main question regarding the future of tradition political ideologies. In this final part of the project, we will make three guiding assumptions: Some contributions to political thought are expected to strengthen the established ideologies by refining them while others might melt two or more to a conglomerate, while even others might not neatly fit into well-established categories but opening up new dimensions. The research community so far has not yet been engaged in doing such an undertaking: creating an extensive map (so to speak) of contemporary political thought since 1990 and asking the question of the future of the political ideologies in the process.

该研究项目旨在创建一个研究的相关贡献，当代政治思想在德国自1990年以来。收集的材料将在自由主义，保守主义，社会主义（包括社会民主主义思想）和绿色政治思想之间的政治意识形态的明确区别的具体考虑下进行讨论。在这种情况下，“政治思想”被理解为所有面向公众的文本陈述的总和，这些文本陈述要求一定程度的理论一致性、反思和分析质量，并侧重于分析、批评和对一般政治制度（政体）、过程（政治）和政治结果（政策）提供规范性指导。对政治思想的贡献被进一步理解为介于政治理论和纯粹的公共纲领性声明之间。重点时间框架是由于深刻认识到自1989/90年以来出现了严峻的挑战，如全球化进程中民族国家权力的削弱，社会日益个性化的趋势，以及日益需要促进和协调生态和经济目标。我们认为书籍、论文和文章是相关的，它们要么超过一定程度的公众认可，同时通过使其适应新问题来推进既定的政治意识形态而脱颖而出，要么抛弃旧的范式，开辟政治思想的新方向。这类文本的范围从Botho Strauss的《Anschwellender Bocksgesang》（1993年）到Jürgen Habermas的《Die Zukunft der menschlichen Natur》（2001年），再到Tim杰克逊的《Wohlstand ohne Wachstum》（繁荣而不增长，2011年）。我们将收集文本讨论相关的政治思想在一个多维度的调查，根据定量标准（销售数字），定性标准（已发表的名单），通过专家之间的调查，并通过审查相关期刊的选择。这一过程将减少文本的数量，以便进行深入分析，然后我们将重点放在关于传统政治意识形态未来的主要问题上。在这个项目的最后一部分，我们将提出三个指导性假设：一些对政治思想的贡献预计将通过完善它们来加强既定的意识形态，而另一些则可能将两个或更多的意识形态融合为一个集团，而甚至其他人也可能不完全符合既定的类别，但开辟了新的维度。到目前为止，研究界还没有从事这样的工作：创建一个广泛的地图（可以这么说）自1990年以来的当代政治思想，并在这个过程中提出政治意识形态的未来问题。