Space Weather Roundtable

太空天气圆桌会议

• 批准号: 2148115
• 负责人: Colleen Hartman
• 金额: $ 23.35万
• 依托单位: National Academy of Sciences
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 项目类别: Standard Grant
• 财政年份: 2022
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2022-02-01 至 2027-01-31
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=2148115&HistoricalAwards=false
• 关键词: Space; Weather; Roundtable

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine will establish a Space Weather Roundtable, supported by NSF, NASA, and NOAA, as mandated in the 2020 Promoting Research and Observations of Space Weather to Improve the Forecasting of Tomorrow Act. A standing committee, the Space Weather Roundtable will include approximately 15 experts in the physical sciences, engineering, social sciences and economics, emergency management, and federal, state, or local policy-making. In addition, each of the sponsors—NOAA, NASA, and NSF—will designate an agency representative as an ex-officio member. They will discuss issues of mutual concern related to space weather research, operations, policy, and societal resilience. The Roundtable will facilitate advances in space weather modeling and forecasting; increase coordination of space weather research-to-operations and operations-to-research; and improve our Nation’s preparedness for space weather events. This effort will be transformative, as space weather has the potential to affect hundreds of millions of people in the United States and billions across the world due to its impacts on critical Infrastructure.This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.

美国国家科学院、工程院和医学院将建立一个由NSF、NASA和NOAA支持的空间天气圆桌会议，这是《2020年促进空间天气研究和观测以改善未来预报法案》的授权。空间气象圆桌会议是一个常设委员会，将包括大约15名物理科学、工程、社会科学和经济学、应急管理以及联邦、州或地方决策方面的专家。此外，NOAA、NASA和NSF将各自指定一名机构代表作为当然成员。他们将讨论与空间天气研究，业务，政策和社会复原力有关的共同关心的问题。该圆桌会议将促进空间气象建模和预报的进步;加强空间气象研究到业务和业务到研究的协调;并改善我国对空间气象事件的准备。这一努力将是变革性的，因为空间天气由于其对关键基础设施的影响，有可能影响美国数亿人和世界各地数十亿人。该奖项反映了NSF的法定使命，并通过使用基金会的知识价值和更广泛的影响审查标准进行评估，被认为值得支持。