课题基金 / 基金详情

Public-Private Partnerships in Education: Experimental Evidence

Public-Private Partnerships in Education: Experimental Evidence
教育领域的公私合作:实验证据
批准号:
2214992
负责人:
Felipe Barrera-Osorio
金额:
$41.4万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
Standard Grant
财政年份:
2022
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2022-08-01 至 2024-07-31

项目摘要

项目成果

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
提供教育的公私伙伴关系有可能为中低收入社区提供高质量的教育。 然而,大多数研究的有效性,这种伙伴关系没有充分控制学生的学生背景进入这些PPP学校。 本研究结合随机分配的学生到学校的学生背景和结果的丰富数据,研究购买力平价对几个学生的结果的有效性。 通过抽签选择的学生随机分配到PPP学校和当地公立学校,使研究人员能够充分控制学生的社会经济背景,从而能够隔离学校类型对结果的影响。 研究人员将比较通过彩票选择进入PPP学校但被分配到公立学校的学生与在彩票中被选中后进入PPP学校的学生的结果。 研究结果将为美国和全球政府希望扩大低收入环境中高质量教育供应并增加高质量人力资本供应的PPP的设计和实施提供信息。 研究结果还将有助于美国成为全球领先的PPP,为低收入和中等收入社区的学生提供高质量的教育。该项目解决了关于PPP在提供教育方面的效率和公平性的两个关键问题。与传统公立学校相比,这些PPP学校是否提高了学生的学习成果?解决这一问题的办法是,利用当地学校董事会设立的抽签制度,衡量被分配到公私伙伴关系学校或传统公立学校的学生的学习进展情况,确保结果的差异是由于学校的原因,而不是公私伙伴关系学生和非公私伙伴关系学生之间的系统差异。关于学生特点和作业的行政数据将与来自学生及其家庭的调查数据相结合,包括对学习成果的适当测试。鉴于公私营合作学校的潜在好处及其为弱势背景学生提供服务的目标,是什么因素导致家庭选择申请这些学校?将通过调查面临这一决定的有幼儿的家庭来探索这一点,从而更好地了解公共政策如何扩大和多样化获得有效学校的机会。研究结果将为美国和全球政府希望扩大低收入环境中高质量教育供应并增加高质量人力资本供应的PPP的设计和实施提供信息。 该研究成果还将帮助美国成为为中低收入社区的学生提供高质量教育的PPP的全球领导者。该奖项反映了NSF的法定使命,并通过使用基金会的知识价值和更广泛的影响审查标准进行评估而被认为值得支持。
英文摘要
Public-private partnerships (PPPs) for the provision of education have the potential to provide high quality education to low- and middle-income communities. However, most studies of the effectiveness of such partnerships do not adequately control for student background of students enter these PPP schools. This research combines randomized assignment of students to schools with rich data on both student backgrounds and outcomes to study the effectiveness of PPPs on several student outcomes. The randomized assignment of students chosen through a lottery to a PPP school and a local public school allows the researchers to adequately control for student socioeconomic background hence able to isolate the effects of school type on outcomes. The researchers will compare the outcomes of students chosen by the lottery to attend PPP schools but were assigned to public schools to those of students who did attend a PPP school after being chosen in the lottery. The findings will inform the design and implementation of PPPs in the US and globally where governments wish to expand the supply of high-quality education in low-income settings and increase the supply of high-quality human capital. The research results will also help establish the US as the global leader in PPPs for the provision of high-quality education for students in low- and middle-income communities.This project addresses two key questions regarding the efficacy and equity of PPPs in the provision of education. Do these PPP schools improve student learning outcomes, compared to traditional public schools? This question is addressed by measuring learning progress among students assigned to PPP or traditional public schools using a lottery instituted by the local school board, ensuring that differences in outcomes are due to the schools rather than systematic differences between PPP and non-PPP students. Administrative data on student characteristics and assignments will be combined with survey data from students and their households, including appropriate tests of learning outcomes. Given the potential benefits of PPP schools and their goal of serving students from disadvantaged backgrounds, what factors cause families to choose to apply to them? This will be explored by surveying households with young children who are facing this decision, improving understanding of the ways in which public policies can expand and diversify access to effective schools. The findings will inform the design and implementation of PPPs in the US and globally where governments wish to expand the supply of high-quality education in low-income settings and increase the supply of high-quality human capital. The research results will also help establish the US as the global leader in PPPs for the provision of high-quality education for students in low- and middle-income communities.This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
海外基金