权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Alexander of Aphrodisias' commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics revisited: a new edition of the Greek text on the basis of a complete collation of unknown sources.

阿弗罗迪西亚斯的亚历山大对亚里士多德形而上学的评论重新审视：在对未知来源的完整整理的基础上，希腊文本的新版本。

基本信息

批准号：
255046400
负责人：
Dr. Pantelis Golitsis
金额：
--
依托单位：
Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften
依托单位国家：
德国
项目类别：
Research Fellowships
财政年份：
2014
资助国家：
德国
起止时间：
2013-12-31 至 2016-12-31
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/255046400?language=en
关键词：
Alexander Aphrodisias commentary Aristotle Metaphysics

项目摘要

The project aims at producing a new critical edition of Alexander of Aphrodisias' (fl. AD 200) commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics, one of the texts that most shaped the understanding of the Philosopher for centuries. This text has been edited twice up to date (1847 by Hermann Bonitz; 1891 by Michael Hayduck) but in a very unsatisfactory manner, mainly for three reasons: 1) Both editions rely on an inadequate heuristic work on the manuscript tradition of the commentary. 2) Both editors based their text mainly on a collation of just two manuscripts without having previously undertaken any stemmatic investigation of them. 3) Both editors misleadingly combined manuscripts that contain an anonymous commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics from the 6th/7th cent. with manuscripts that transmit Alexander's genuine commentary, thus leading to numerous false 'corrections'. The aim of the present project is to produce a reliable edition of Alexander's commentary on the Metaphysics, based on a complete collation of the textually independent Greek manuscripts as well as of the Latin translation by Juan Ginès Sepúlveda (1527), and conform to modern standards of philology and text science.

该项目旨在制作一个新的阿芙罗狄西亚的亚历山大（公元200年）对亚里士多德《形而上学》的评论的批判版本，这是几个世纪以来最能塑造对哲学家的理解的文本之一。这段文字已编辑两次到目前为止（1847年由赫尔曼Bonitz; 1891年由迈克尔Hayduck），但在一个非常不满意的方式，主要有三个原因：1）这两个版本依赖于一个不充分的启发性工作的手稿传统的评论。2)这两位编辑主要是根据他们的文字整理只有两个手稿，而没有事先进行任何调查他们的词干。3)这两个编辑误导性地结合手稿，其中包含一个匿名的评论亚里士多德的形而上学从第六/第七世纪。与手稿，传输亚历山大的真正的评论，从而导致许多错误的“更正”。本项目的目的是根据对文本独立的希腊手稿以及胡安·吉内斯·塞普尔韦达（Juan Ginès Sepúlveda）（1527年）的拉丁文译本的完整整理，并符合语言学和文本科学的现代标准，为亚历山大的《形而上学》评注制作一个可靠的版本。