Closing Achievement Gaps in Core Undergraduate Civil Engineering Courses
Closing Achievement Gaps in Core Undergraduate Civil Engineering Courses
批准号:
2318158
负责人:
Sunai Kim
金额:
$100.0万
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
Standard Grant
财政年份:
2023
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
未结题
起止时间:
2023-08-01 至 2027-07-31
中文摘要
在改善本科STEM教育的支持下:西班牙裔服务机构(HSI计划),该项目旨在开发,实施和评估一种新的方法,旨在提高加州州立理工大学波莫纳分校(CPP)和Mt.圣安东尼奥学院(Mt. SAC)。大约三分之一的学生在合作机构没有通过两个最重要的基础工程课程:工程静力学和材料力学。此外,来自历史上在工程领域代表性不足的群体的学生完成这些课程的速度比同龄人低约10%。这些关键课程的成绩不佳导致辍学率上升、毕业延迟和后续课程的成功率降低。该项目将通过四个循证活动提高学生在工程静力学、材料力学和后续课程中的成功率:1)夏桥计划(SBP),为学生准备守门人课程; 2)同伴辅导; 3)24名学生的本科研究经验;以及4)参加美国土木工程师协会为17名教师举办的土木工程卓越教学研讨会。这些活动旨在提高学生在两门重点课程中的学习成绩,减少平均学位时间,并促进跨课程部分的一致,高质量的教学。这将推动学生的成功,并为更多样化和有能力的STEM劳动力创造一条途径。该项目的有效性将通过由两个理论框架指导的混合方法研究来衡量:人们如何学习模型和交叉性框架。结果将通过追求四个目标推动积极的学生成果。首先是告知工程教育领域关于提高学术成绩和减少工程静力学和材料力学成绩差距的最佳实践。第二是为需要复习和强调的特定主题提供证据,以便学生在入学前做好准备。第三是扩展如何理解一个夏桥计划,同侪辅导和本科研究经验可以影响学生的参与,学习成绩和时间的程度。第四,也是最后一点,是促进一致的课程设置和教学实践。主要的数据来源包括在夏桥计划和重点课程,验证测量空间推理和学生参与度的调查工具,以及教师教学实践的数据之前和之后的ExCEED教学研讨会的关键主题的评估性能。该项目由HSI计划支持,该计划旨在加强本科STEM教育,扩大STEM参与,并建立HSI的机构转型能力。该奖项反映了NSF的法定使命,并通过使用基金会的智力价值和更广泛的影响审查标准进行评估,被认为值得支持。
英文摘要
With support from the Improving Undergraduate STEM Education: Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSI Program), this project aims to develop, implement, and evaluate a new approach designed to improve student outcomes in early engineering courses at California State Polytechnic University at Pomona (CPP) and Mt. San Antonio College (Mt. SAC). Approximately one third of students at the collaborating institutions do not pass two of the most important foundational engineering courses: Engineering Statics and Mechanics of Materials. Furthermore, students from groups that have historically been underrepresented in engineering complete these courses at a rate approximately 10% lower than their peers. Poor outcomes in these key courses contribute to increased dropout rates, delayed graduation, and lower success rates in subsequent courses. This project will improve students’ success in Engineering Statics, Mechanics of Materials, and subsequent courses through four evidence-based activities: 1) a Summer Bridge Program (SBP) to prepare students for the gatekeeper courses; 2) peer tutoring; 3) undergraduate research experiences for 24 students; and 4) participation in the American Society of Civil Engineers' Excellence in Civil Engineering (ExCEEd) Teaching Workshop for 17 faculty. These activities are designed to improve students’ academic performance in the two focal courses, reduce average time-to-degree, and promote consistent, high-quality instruction across course sections. This will drive student success and create a pathway for a more diverse and capable STEM workforce.The effectiveness of this project will be measured through mixed-methods research guided by two theoretical frameworks: the How People Learn model and the Intersectionality framework. The results will drive positive student outcomes by pursuing four objectives. First is to inform the engineering education field about best practices for improving academic performance and reducing the achievement gaps in Engineering Statics and Mechanics of Materials. Second is to provide evidence for specific topics that need to be reviewed and emphasized to prepare students before they enroll in these courses. Third is to extend understanding of how a summer bridge program, peer tutoring, and undergraduate research experiences could impact students’ engagement, academic performance, and time-to-degree. Fourth, and finally, is to promote consistent course offerings and teaching practices. Major data sources include performance on assessments covering key topics in the summer bridge program and focal courses, validated survey instruments measuring spatial reasoning and student engagement, and data on faculty pedagogical practices taken before and after the ExCEED Teaching Workshop. This project is support by the HSI Program which aims to enhance undergraduate STEM education, broaden participation in STEM, and build capacity for institutional transformation at HSIs.This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
海外基金