Which region? The politics of the UN Security Council P5 in international security crises

哪个地区？

• 批准号: 282959679
• 负责人: Dr. Nadine Godehardt
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich (ETH)
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Grants
• 财政年份: 2016
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2015-12-31 至 2018-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/282959679?language=en
• 关键词: region; politics; UN; Security; Council

This project aims to theorise and empirically investigate how the five Permanent Members of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) - China, France, Russia, UK and US - politically constitute regions, regional actors and regional organisations during international security crises. We primarily ask what impact does their understanding of the role of the regional have on international efforts at governing crises. Due to the central role the regional level continues to play in international efforts to manage security crises, we take the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) as the key international forum and actor for representing, debating and responding to international security crisis. While, owing to the strong and institutionally enshrined influence that the Permanent Five (P5) have on determining the UNSC position and the terms of its debate, we also consider its as key foreign-policy actors shaping the international discourse on security crisis. We thus base our analysis on: one, the articulations and response of the P5 states as foreign-policy actors; and, two, the debate and negotiation within the UNSC on its representation and (lack of) response. In this way, we will analyse the perspectives of key international actors, but also the similarities, dissimilarities and contestation between them. To analyse the P5 members' political constitution of the region/regional during international security crisis, we focus on three recent case studies: Afghanistan (2011), Syria/Iraq/ISIS (2011-); Ukraine/Crimea (2014-) crises. In all of these crises, the designation of the region and the role for the regional was contested, and thus they represent test-cases for investigating the nature and the impact of agreement/disagreement on the region/regional in contemporary international security governance. In so doing, the project will address three primary research objectives: 1. To assess how the greater emphasis on and legitimacy attributed to the region/regional in international politics effects the governance of international security crises? 2. To investigate how key international actors (the P5, UNSC) are representing the region/regional in international security crises, and what effect is this having on their perspective on the crises? 3. To evaluate the degree to which perspectives on the region/regional, and its role in efforts at governing international security, are contested among key international actors (the P5, UNSC)?

该项目旨在从理论和实证上研究联合国安全理事会（UNSC）的五个常任理事国-中国，法国，俄罗斯，英国和美国-在国际安全危机中如何在政治上构成地区，地区行为体和地区组织。我们首先要问的是，他们对区域作用的理解对治理危机的国际努力有什么影响。由于区域一级在管理安全危机的国际努力中继续发挥中心作用，我们认为联合国安全理事会是代表、辩论和应对国际安全危机的主要国际论坛和行为体。同时，由于五个常任理事国在决定安理会立场及其辩论条件方面具有强大的和制度上的影响力，我们也认为它们是塑造国际安全危机讨论的关键外交政策行为者。因此，我们的分析基于：第一，五常国家作为外交政策参与者的表达和回应;第二，联合国安理会内部关于其代表性和（缺乏）回应的辩论和谈判。通过这种方式，我们将分析主要国际行为体的观点，以及它们之间的相似之处、不同之处和相似之处。为了分析国际安全危机期间五常成员的地区/地区政治宪法，我们重点研究了三个最近的案例：阿富汗（2011年），叙利亚/伊拉克/伊斯兰国（2011-）;乌克兰/克里米亚（2014-）危机。在所有这些危机中，区域的指定和区域的作用都有争议，因此它们是调查当代国际安全治理中协议/分歧对区域/区域的性质和影响的试验案例。在此过程中，该项目将解决三个主要研究目标：1。评估在国际政治中对区域/区域的更大重视及其合法性如何影响国际安全危机的治理？2.调查主要国际行为体（五常、联合国安理会）如何在国际安全危机中代表该区域/区域，这对他们对危机的看法有什么影响？3.评价主要国际行为体（五常、联合国安理会）对区域/区域观点及其在管理国际安全努力中的作用的争议程度？

项目成果

The Multidimensionality of Regions in World Politics

世界政治中地区的多维性

• DOI: 10.4324/9780429319853
• 作者: Nadine Godehardt;Paul J. Kohlenberg (Hg.)
• 通讯作者: Paul J. Kohlenberg (Hg.)

Introducing UNSCdeb8 (beta): A Database for Corpus-Driven Research on the United Nations Security Council

UNSCdeb8（测试版）简介：联合国安理会语料库驱动研究数据库

• DOI: 10.3929/ethz-b-000356671
• 发表时间: 2019
• 作者: Paul J. Kohlenberg;Nadine Godehardt;Stephen Aris;Fred Sündermann;Aglaya Snetkov;Juliet Fall
• 通讯作者: Juliet Fall