权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Rhetoric of/in the phenomenology. Speech and language in Edmund Husserl and in Martin Heidegger's early works

现象学中的修辞学。

基本信息

批准号：
314042158
负责人：
Dr. Nicola Zambon
金额：
--
依托单位：
Institut für Religionswissenschaft (WE 8)
依托单位国家：
德国
项目类别：
Research Fellowships
财政年份：
2016
资助国家：
德国
起止时间：
2015-12-31 至 2016-12-31
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/314042158?language=en
关键词：
Rhetoric phenomenology.Speech language Edmund

项目摘要

Dedicated to the interrelation between philosophy and rhetoric, this research project focuses on the rhetoric of philosophy, respectively a rhetoric at the service of philosophy. Rhetoric is not understood here as a mere art of fine words or as sophistry: The term defines, firstly, speech and persuasion as a spontaneous, pretheoretical and communicative ability of humans; secondly, the regular and systematic use of this ability; and finally, the technique of persuasion itself. The proposed project discusses the rhetoric of phenomenology in two respects, namely, as conception and as use of language: The aversion of rhetoric in Edmund Husserl´s Logische Untersuchungen and Heidegger´s affinity for rhetoric in Sein und Zeit provide the starting point. Initially, I will outline the respective conceptions of language in Husserl and Heidegger, and scrutinize their mutual influences in order to reconstruct the network of transfer, continuation, and repercussion that characterizes the relation between both authors. In this regard, I will carefully examine how the aspect of communicative speech, which was excluded in the Logische Untersuchungen but returns in Husserl´s later writings, is negotiated in the context of the phenomenology of body, intersubjectivity, and lifeworld. In a second step, I will investigate if and how Husserl and Heidegger themselves reflect on the use of language: The language thus becomes topical as the medium of phenomenological description. In doing this, particular attention is given to the rhetorical means, which play a central role in the constitution and assertion of science and theory.

本研究致力于哲学与修辞学之间的相互关系，侧重于哲学修辞学，即为哲学服务的修辞学。修辞学在这里并不仅仅被理解为一门巧言巧语的艺术或诡辩：该术语首先将演讲和说服定义为人类自发的、理论前的和交流的能力；其次，定期和系统地使用这种能力；最后，说服的技巧本身。本课题从两个方面探讨现象学的修辞学，即作为语言的概念和作为语言的使用：胡塞尔的《S》中的修辞反感和海德格尔的S的《塞恩和时代》中的修辞亲和力提供了起点。首先，我将概述胡塞尔和海德格尔各自的语言概念，并仔细考察他们之间的相互影响，以重构表征两位作家之间关系的迁移、延续和反响的网络。在这一点上，我将仔细考察交际言语的方面是如何在身体、主体间性和生活世界的现象学的背景下谈判的，这一方面在逻辑恩特苏亨根中被排除在外，但在胡塞尔·S后来的著作中又回来了。在第二步，我将调查胡塞尔和海德格尔自己是否以及如何反思语言的使用：语言因此成为作为现象学描述的媒介的话题。在这样做的过程中，特别注意修辞手段，它在科学和理论的构成和断言中发挥着核心作用。