Coordination Funds

协调基金

• 批准号: 315061370
• 负责人: Professor Dr. Martin Endreß
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Professur für Allgemeine Soziologie
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Units
• 财政年份: 2016
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2015-12-31 至 2023-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/315061370?language=en
• 关键词: Coordination; Funds

Speaking of ‘resilience’, various academic disciplines have recently adopted scientific approaches from (in particular) Social Ecology and Developmental Psychology aimed at a specific class of social processes: They investigate strategies, resources and conditions that can potentially ensure the survival or preservation of individual and/or social ‘systems’ in cases of external existential threats (e.g., natural disasters or social damages). References to ‘resilience’ are more specifically framed by contrasting it with phenomena of crisis, threat, vulnerability, and risk. In contrast to these concepts, resilience focuses on the potential of social and societal structures and units to persist and resist when faced with exceptional, disruptive processes of social change. Before this background, the Research Group aims at developing and refining a concept of resilience in dialogue between the historical sciences and Sociology. This concept should allow for analysing non-linear and multi-layered socio-historical processes characterized by a close connection between phenomena of continuity and discontinuity, such as they have been observed in historical processes of the 13th to 17th centuries. This innovative approach, which conceives of ‘resilience’ not in essentialist terms but as a heuristic for analysing processes, will enable the Research Group to explore both the needs of transformation when adopting the resilience approach of the socio-ecological discourse, and the resulting potentials for socio-historical research. In this way, the Research Group builds on the insights and proceeds of the first funding period, continues its work in view of the concepts developed thus far, which have proven to be extremely fruitful, refines them further, at the same time complementing their theoretical and empirical bases. Research during the second funding period will focus especially on analysing the connections between phenomena of continuity and discontinuity in historical processes, and on the perception and meaning of disruptive phenomena in socio-historical phases of disruptive change. The concept of resilience used in the analysis of both modern and 13th- to 17th-century constellations will be compared, in view of its analytical potential, with other socio-historical conceptions of process; its sustainability and its conceptual surplus will be tested empirically. The Research Group will consider the historical variation in the notions concerning the times, the current threats, and the concomitant ideas concerning human agency. The group will draw on a set of project-specific methods: techniques of sequential analysis from qualitative social research; textual comparison as current in historical hermeneutics and semantics, and the analysis of historical networks.

说到“复原力”，各学科最近采用了(特别是)社会生态学和发展心理学的科学方法，针对特定类别的社会过程：它们研究在外部生存威胁(例如，自然灾害或社会损害)的情况下，有可能确保个人和/或社会“系统”生存或保存的战略、资源和条件。“韧性”的提法更具体，是通过将其与危机、威胁、脆弱和风险等现象进行对比来构建的。与这些概念相反，复原力侧重于社会和社会结构和单位在面对特殊的、颠覆性的社会变革过程时坚持和抵制的潜力。在此背景下，研究小组的目标是在历史科学和社会学之间的对话中发展和提炼韧性的概念。这一概念应当能够分析以连续性和间断性现象之间密切联系为特征的非线性和多层次的社会历史进程，例如在13至17世纪的历史进程中观察到的这些进程。这一创新方法不是从本质上设想“复原力”，而是作为分析过程的启发式方法，这将使研究组能够在采用社会生态话语的复原力方法时探索变革的需要，以及由此产生的社会历史研究的潜力。通过这种方式，研究小组以第一个资助期的见解和收益为基础，根据迄今已证明非常富有成效的概念继续开展工作，进一步完善这些概念，同时补充它们的理论和经验基础。第二个资助期的研究将特别侧重于分析历史进程中的连续性和间断性现象之间的联系，以及在颠覆性变革的社会历史阶段对颠覆性现象的认识和意义。鉴于现代星座和13世纪至17世纪星座的分析潜力，将把复原力概念与其他社会历史进程概念进行比较；将对其可持续性和概念盈余进行实证检验。研究小组将审议关于人类机构的时代观念、当前威胁和伴随而来的观念的历史变化。该小组将借鉴一套特定于项目的方法：来自定性社会研究的顺序分析技术；历史解释学和语义学中当前的文本比较，以及历史网络分析。