Legal aspects of criminal proceedings concerning international core crimes in criminal courts of Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina; with focus on questions of individual criminal liability and sentencing issues.

塞尔维亚和波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那刑事法院涉及国际核心罪行的刑事诉讼的法律问题；

基本信息

批准号：
321941942
负责人：
Professorin Dr. Sabine Swoboda
金额：
--
依托单位：
Lehrstuhl für Strafrecht und Strafprozessrecht (Bernsmann)
依托单位国家：
德国
项目类别：
Research Grants
财政年份：
2017
资助国家：
德国
起止时间：
2016-12-31 至 2020-12-31
项目状态：
已结题

来源：
https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/321941942?language=en
关键词：
Legal aspects criminal proceedings concerning

项目摘要

The project focuses on analyzing criminal judgements by national criminal courts of Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina on international core crimes committed in the Yugoslavian Civil War of 1991 to 1995. The analysis concentrates on the modes of individual criminal liability, accompanied by a systematic examination of individual sentencing.The project centers on criminal judgements that deal with complex modes of participation, in particular with perpetrators who acted together with or in the context of a collective criminal enterprise or whose contributions substantially furthered the criminal purposes of a collective criminal enterprise.On the basis of these judgements the project discusses traditional and new modes of individual criminal liability (in particular Joint Criminal Enterprise and Command Responsibility).The project examines whether(i) the modes of individual criminal liability that have been developed in customary international law are accepted by national courts as legitimate in the light of constitutional demands and human rights ;(ii) the traditional national modes of individual criminal liability (i.e. perpetrator and participant) are sufficient to depict all aspects and dimensions of the criminal injustice involved in participating in state crimes, and (iii) the terms according to which a post-conflict society assess the individual criminal responsibility of a perpetrator involved in collectively organized mass crimes. The focal point of interest is the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina and its Section I (the Special Chamber for War Crimes). This Court is the only court in the region that applies special international modes of responsibility like Joint Criminal Enterprise and Command Responsibility (even if only to crimes against humanity). By analyzing modes of individual criminal responsibility the project intends to illuminate specific aspects of the complex picture of collectively commited mass crimes during the Yugoslavian Civil War of 1991 to 1995. The criminological debate currently focuses on how to link the different explanations of how state crime emerges (developed from a micro, meso and macro perspective) in order to develop an overall picture of the macro-criminal activities that result in international core crimes. The criminological debate is, on the one hand, interested in the macro-criminal context of the crimes, but also in the individual contribution to the crime, and it attempts to define different degrees of individual responsibility for the criminal act.The judgements of the national courts of Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, and in particular the judgements of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, are for the most part available online. We will translate these judgements in parts (concerning modes of liability and sentencing), compile corresponding analysis charts, conduct interviews with legal practitioners and - insofar as possible - draft a model form for individualized sentencing.

该项目的重点是分析塞尔维亚，波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那国家刑事判决，涉及1991年至1995年南斯拉夫内战中犯下的国际核心罪行集体犯罪企业或其贡献的背景大大进一步进一步促进了集体犯罪企业的犯罪目的。在这些判断的基础上，该项目讨论了传统和新的刑事责任方式（尤其是犯罪企业和命令责任）。项目审查（i）（i）根据习惯性的国际法律，对人类的犯罪责任审查了习惯性的诉讼方式，是根据习惯性的，是根据习惯性的，是根据习惯性的；传统的个人刑事责任模式（即肇事者和参与者）足以描述参与州犯罪的刑事不公正式的所有方面和维度，以及（iii）术语后，冲突后社会评估涉及集体组织大规模犯罪的肇事者的个人刑事责任。感兴趣的焦点是波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那及其第一部分（战争罪特别商会）。该法院是该地区唯一采用特殊国际责任模式的法院，例如联合犯罪企业和命令责任（即使只是针对人类犯罪）。通过分析个人犯罪责任的模式，该项目打算在1991年至1991年至1995年的南斯拉夫内战期间阐明集体大规模犯罪的复杂情况的特定方面。犯罪学辩论目前目前介绍如何将各种国家犯罪的解释联系起来，从而从一场企业中开发出来，以制定依赖元素的整体图片，以构成整体图片，以构成整体图像。 The criminological debate is, on the one hand, interested in the macro-criminal context of the crimes, but also in the individual contribution to the crime, and it attempts to define different degrees of individual responsibility for the criminal act.The judgements of the national courts of Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, and in particular the judgements of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, are for the most part available online.我们将以各个部分（有关责任和量刑模式），编译相应的分析图表，与法律从业人员进行访谈，并在可能的情况下（尽可能）草拟个性化判决的模型表格。