Sprachliche Differenz zwischen Unterscheidung und Ereignis (Jakobson, Luhmann, Humboldt, Gadamer, Heidegger)

区别和事件之间的语言差异（雅各布森、卢曼、洪堡、伽达默尔、海德格尔）

• 批准号: 324636335
• 负责人: Dr. Hajnalka Halasz
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Forschungsschwerpunkt Lebenswissen
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Publication Grants
• 财政年份: 2016
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2015-12-31 至 2016-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/324636335?language=en
• 关键词: Sprachliche; Differenz; zwischen; Unterscheidung; und

It is certainly no accident that, at the start of the twentieth century, as the effect of language on (philosophical) thinking was no longer reported in terms of symptoms and signs, but rather as having "witnesses" that is, as the first scientific reflections on this knowledgeappeared, - the definition of language or of the sign was already being seen as inseparable from the definition of the difference. At the time, language, even before it could become the subject of these scientific reflections, was already understood as a type of difference, and indeed this occurred without the strange appearance of this conceptual connection being able to be linked to a conscious act of foundation - or any sort of starting theory. Language did not suddenly arise as an object of interest or subject at the centre of attention. Rather, its effect was felt as an event that was already past but still latent and formative in the present, which, while certainly interpreteddifferently, was experienced together; while it certainly cannot be left uncommented on, it resists the temporal-causal order of the narrative and its distinctions. At the same time, language itself - with its intrusive experience - evades; it retreats back into itself as a difference and disappears just at the moment in which it as such appears and arises as a subject. When we consider the twentieth century history (whether a story of success or decline) of the definition of language from this point of view, or we read it as an answer to a latent event, the truth - demonstrable textually - of the interdependence of the definition of language with difference can be better understood. The goal of the present paper is to put the above-formulated hypotheses to the test through a close reading of exemplary works (by Roman Jakobson, Niklas Luhmann, Wilhelm von Humboldt, Hans-Georg Gadamer, and Martin Heidegger, among others),or, alternatively, to pursue the interdependence of language and difference in these texts.

在二十世纪初，由于语言对（哲学）思维的影响不再在症状和体征方面报告，而是偶然的，而是要有“证人”，因为这是对这种知识的第一个科学思考，这是对语言的第一个科学思考 - 与该语言的定义或符号的定义相距甚远。当时，语言甚至在它成为这些科学思考的主题之前，已经被理解为一种差异，实际上，这种概念联系的奇怪外观就可以与有意识的基础行为联系在一起，或者是任何形式的起始理论。语言并没有突然作为关注的中心作为感兴趣的对象或主题。相反，它的作用被认为是已经过去的事件，但目前仍然潜在和形成性，尽管肯定会解释，但却是一起经历的。虽然当然不能毫不含糊地说，但它抵制了叙事及其区分的暂时性伴奏顺序。同时，语言本身（具有侵入性的经历）逃避；它以差异的形式退回自身，并在出现并作为主题出现的那一刻消失。当我们从这种角度考虑语言定义的二十世纪历史（无论是成功的故事还是衰落的故事）时，或者我们将其视为对潜在事件的答案，可以更好地理解与语言定义的相互依存关系的真相 - 可证明的文本依存关系。本文的目的是通过仔细阅读示例性的作品（罗马·雅各布森，尼克拉斯·卢曼，威廉·冯·洪堡，汉斯·乔治·加达默尔和马丁·海德格尔等人），或者，以这些语言和不同的语言依赖这些依赖性的依赖，将上述假设的目的放在测试中。