Within and Beyond Law. Feminist Perspectives on Urban & Housing Commons

在第一次资助期间，公地作为一个理论敏感的概念，以思考和分析社区的城市共同住房在一个非本质化的方式。在第二阶段，将更深入地研究城市和住房公地的两个核心方面-公地的开垦和（长期）维护过程。利用这一概念基础，从第一阶段的两个经验线索将继续通过两个民族志个案研究。由于新的所有权模式与城市住房政策的相关性，案例研究A审查了德国的第一个社区土地信托。它将作为土地政策工具的一种新的所有权形式与自我管理的住房社区概念结合起来。在（再）要求权的意义上，它的目的是土地和生活空间的长期非商业化，从而是确保公地的财产关系。研究发现，城市合住中的性别歧视和性暴力问题具有经验相关性。因此，案例研究B审查了社区中性别歧视和性暴力的集体办法-维护领域的冲突，其中包括包容和排斥、等级制度（非正式）以及内部制定和实施的规则，该项目的目的是从经验上了解，如何试行以团结为基础的城市和住房公地形式，以及法律在这方面发挥的作用。 通过将两个案例研究联系起来，该项目研究了a）正式结构方面与公地内部关系之间的潜在联系，从而有助于将回收和维护过程系统地联系起来。该项目正在研究B）两种处理法律的方式。一方面，它提出了使现行法律可用于发展保护公地的法律的形式的可能性。另一方面，它探讨了“公共机构”的功能，遵循自我组织的原则，是目前的法律的制度之外的实践。这项研究扩展了以前边缘的女权主义公地研究。它集中在解放的“关系模式”的想象和可观察到的权力塑造的日常实践之间的差异。通过收集关于新共同体日常做法的有根据的材料，并通过研究关于（其他）一般社会条件的铭刻但有争议的想法，该项目有助于解决森林的首要问题。

During the first funding period, commons served as a theoretical sensitizing concept in order to think about and analyze communities of urban co-housing in a non-essentializing way. In the second period, two central dimensions of urban and housing commons will be investigated in greater depth--processes of the reclaiming and (long-term) maintenance of commons. Using this conceptual basis, two empirical threads from the first period will be continued by means of two ethnographic case studies. Due to the relevance of new models of ownership in the context of urban housing policy, case study A examines the first Community Land Trust in Germany. It combines a new form of ownership as a land-policy instrument with the concept of self-administered housing communities. In the sense of (re)claiming, it aims at the long-term decommodification of land and living space and thus of property relations that secure commons. The subjects of sexism and sexual violence in urban co-housing were found to be empirically relevant. Thus, case study B examines collective approaches to sexism and sexual violence in communities - conflicts in the area of maintenance, in which inclusion and exclusion, hierarchies (informal), and internally developed and lived rules are negotiated.The aim of the project is to empirically understand, how solidarity-based forms of urban and housing commons are tried out and what role law plays in this context. By linking the two case studies the project examines a) potential connections between formal structural aspects and the relations within commons, and thereby contributes to the systematic linking of processes of reclaiming and maintenance. The project is researching b) two ways of dealing with law. On the one hand, it asks about possibilities of making current law usable for the development of legal forms that protect the commons. On the other hand, it explores how the ‘institutions of commoning’ function which, following the principle of self-organization, are practised outside of the current legal system. The study expands on previously peripheral feminist commons research. It focuses on the discrepancy between the imagination of emancipatory ‘modes of relationships’ and the observable power-shaped everyday practice. By collecting well-founded material on the everyday practices of the new common and by looking at the inscribed but contested ideas of (other) general social conditions, the project contributes to the overarching questions of the FOR.