The licensing of verb-third main clauses in the history of German

德语史上动词第三主句的许可

• 批准号: 376919537
• 负责人: Professorin Dr. Svetlana Petrova
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Fachgruppe Germanistik
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Grants
• 财政年份: 2017
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2016-12-31 至 2021-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/376919537?language=en
• 关键词: licensing; verb; third; main; clauses

Main clauses in which the finite verb is preceded by more than one constituent, so called verb-third clauses, are attested throughout the entire history of German, and because they are problematic for the verb-second analysis of these stages, they have been subject of intensive research. Up to now, the structural equivalence of the various verb-third patterns attested over time has been rejected. It has been assumed that the historical verb-third clauses are not identical with the modern German ones and must be therefore derived within a diachronically older grammar, which is subject to change. The present project aims at a unified explanation of verb-third clauses, i.e., they are derived within a historically constant grammar. The differences observed in the data are attributed to changes in the constraints licensing optimal word order patterns over time, without enforcing a change in underlying structure of the clause.

在有限动词前面有一个以上成分的主句，即所谓的动词-第三子句，在整个德语历史上都得到了证实，因为它们对这些阶段的动词-第二分析存在问题，所以它们一直是深入研究的主题。到目前为止，各种动词-三分之一模式的结构对等性已经被长期证实。人们一直认为，历史上的动词-第三子句与现代德语的动词-第三子句不相同，因此必须从历时上较旧的语法中衍生出来，这种语法可能会发生变化。目前的项目旨在统一解释动词-三分句，即，他们是在一个历史不变的语法衍生。数据中观察到的差异归因于约束条件的变化，随着时间的推移，允许最佳词序模式，而没有强制改变子句的基本结构。

项目成果

Generalized and specialized adverbial resumption in Middle High German and beyond

中古高地德语及以后的广义和专门状语恢复

• DOI: 10.18148/hs/2021.v5i1-13.40
• 发表时间: 2021
• 作者: Catasso;Nicholas
• 通讯作者: Nicholas

He then said...: (Understudied) deviations from V2 in Early Germanic

然后他说：（正在研究）早期日耳曼语中与 V2 的偏差

• DOI: 10.18148/hs/2021.v5i17-26.55
• 发表时间: 2021
• 作者: Catasso;Nicholas;Marco Coniglio;Chiara De Bastiani;Eric Fuß
• 通讯作者: Eric Fuß

How theoretical is your (historical) syntax? Towards a typology of Verb-Third in Early Old High German

您的（历史）语法的理论性如何？

• DOI: 10.1007/s10828-021-09123-7
• 发表时间: 2021
• 期刊: The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics
• 作者: Catasso;Nicholas
• 通讯作者: Nicholas