EXC 243: Formation of Normative Orders

EXC 243：规范性命令的形成

• 批准号: 39215448
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Clusters of Excellence
• 财政年份: 2007
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2006-12-31 至 2018-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/39215448?language=en
• 关键词: EXC; 243; Formation; Normative; Orders

The cluster of excellence examines current conflicts over a just world order from the perspective of a range of disciplines with a thematic focus on the formation of normative orders. In contrast to functionalist approaches, which refer to factors external to norms, the cluster of excellence will deal with internal perspectives, processes and conflicts. Normative orders are defined as "orders of justification", which serve to justify claims to validity, authority and specific distributions of goods. Such orders are embedded in justification models and narratives that arise in historical constellations and are generally handed down, modified and institutionalised over long periods of time. However, every traditional justification narrative overshoots extant orders and thereby offers opportunities for criticism, rejection or resistance.

卓越小组从一系列学科的角度审视当前在公正世界秩序方面的冲突，其专题重点是规范秩序的形成。与提及规范之外的因素的功能主义方法相反，英才小组将处理内部观点、进程和冲突。规范性命令被定义为“正当性命令”，用于证明对商品有效性、权威性和特定分配的主张是合理的。这种秩序嵌入在历史星座中出现的辩护模型和叙述中，通常在很长一段时间内被传承、修改和制度化。然而，每一个传统的理由叙事超越现存的秩序，从而提供了批评，拒绝或抵抗的机会。

项目成果

Law and violence

法律与暴力

• DOI: 10.7765/9781526105097
• 发表时间: 2018
• 作者: Christoph

Real-World Global Egalitarianism

现实世界的全球平等主义

• DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198746928.013.7
• 发表时间: 2018
• 作者: Moellendorf;Darrel
• 通讯作者: Darrel

On the endogeneity of political preferences: Evidence from individual experience with democracy

• DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa0880
• 发表时间: 2015-03-06
• 期刊: SCIENCE
• 影响因子: 56.9
• 作者: Fuchs-Schuendeln, Nicola;Schuendeln, Matthias
• 通讯作者: Schuendeln, Matthias

The Role of Business in Global Governance

企业在全球治理中的作用

• DOI: 10.1057/9780230277533
• 发表时间: 2010
• 作者: Klaus Dieter;A. Flohr;L. Rieth;S. Schwindenhammer (eds.)
• 通讯作者: S. Schwindenhammer (eds.)

Öffentliche Freiheit und Individualität. Hegels Kritik des moralisch-juridischen Modells politischer Kultur

公共自由与个性黑格尔对政治文化道德司法模式的批判

• DOI: 10.3790/978-3-428-54166-9
• 发表时间: 2017
• 作者: Sheplyakova;Tatjana
• 通讯作者: Tatjana