Between Exclusion, Integration, and Inclusion - On the Practical Limitations, Conditions, and Possibilities of Alterity-Politics in Chemnitz

在排斥、整合与包容之间——论开姆尼茨另类政治的实际限制、条件和可能性

• 批准号: 430609777
• 负责人: Dr. Felix Hoffmann
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: Professur für Interkulturelle Kommunikation
• 依托单位国家: 德国
• 项目类别: Research Grants
• 财政年份: 2019
• 资助国家: 德国
• 起止时间: 2018-12-31 至 2022-12-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/430609777?language=en
• 关键词: Between; Exclusion; Integration; Inclusion; Practical

With the refugee-protection crisis of 2015 in Germany, the question of how the integration and participation of refugees and migrants can be achieved or if it is desirable at all, is highly contested. Resistance against a pluralizing society resulted in violent outbursts in Chemnitz in 2018. However, there are also strong networks of civil society actors, politicians, and the local administration to be observed who struggle to promote inclusive and thus participatory alterity-politics. These actors have been largely ignored by the media and academia. The project is focussing the local conflict-dynamics, asking for the practice-logical limitations, conditions, and possibilities of inclusive alterity politics in conflictual relation with various forms of identity-based politics in Chemnitz. An innovative analytical approach of logics of practice in conflict between combat, competition, and mutually response-able polylogue will be applied. The working-hypothesis focusses the practice-logical weakness of alterity-politics in conflictual relation with identity-based politics: Aggressive identitarian, governmental integration politics as well as emancipative identity-politics can be practiced one-sidedly by engaging others (or being engaged) into bordering, combatant, and competitional relations. Alterity-politics by contrast requires a voluntary and mutual questioning of socio-cultural identifications from the start, in debordering practices of mutually response-able dialogue. In order to provide in-depth data on the various conflict-dynamics, a multidimensional methodology of multi-sited-ethnography will be deployed. Participant observation will begin in the various private, public, political, and administrative networks and everyday activities of organized civil society, which supports and collaborates with refugees and migrants. Here, mainly conditions and possibilities of inclusive alterity-politics will be observed. I will also approach political contact zones, where proponents and opponents of integration-matters engage each other. Here, mainly limitations of inclusive alterity-politics will be observed.

随着2015年德国的难民保护危机，如何实现难民和移民的融合和参与，或者是否可取，这一问题备受争议。对多元化社会的抵制导致了2018年切姆尼茨的暴力爆发。然而，也有强大的民间社会行为者、政治家和地方行政当局网络，他们努力促进包容性和参与性的替代政治。这些行为者在很大程度上被媒体和学术界忽视。该项目聚焦于当地的冲突动态，询问在与切姆尼茨各种形式的基于身份的政治的冲突关系中，包容性的另类政治的实践逻辑限制、条件和可能性。一个创新的分析方法的实践逻辑之间的冲突，战斗，竞争和相互回应的多义性将被应用。工作假说聚焦于替代性政治在与基于身份的政治的冲突关系中的实践逻辑弱点：侵略性身份主义、政府整合政治以及解放性身份政治可以通过使他人参与（或被参与）边界、战斗和竞争关系而片面地实践。相反，交替政治要求从一开始就对社会文化认同进行自愿和相互的质疑，并在相互回应的对话实践中打破界限。为了提供关于各种冲突动态的深入数据，将采用多层面的多地点人种学方法。参与者的观察将开始于各种私人、公共、政治和行政网络以及有组织的民间社会的日常活动，这些活动支持难民和移民并与他们合作。在这里，主要是条件和包容性的替代政治的可能性将被观察。我还将探讨政治接触区，在那里，一体化问题的支持者和反对者相互接触。在这里，主要是包容性的替代政治的局限性将被观察到。