权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Comparative Study on Social and Spatial Succession with Housing and Urban Reconstruction Process After Earthquake Disasters in Asia

亚洲地震灾后社会空间演替与住房和城市重建过程的比较研究

基本信息

批准号：
16252002
负责人：
NAKABAYASHI Itsuki
金额：
$ 27.79万
依托单位：
Tokyo Metropolitan University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A)
财政年份：
2004
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2004 至 2006
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

Recently, a lot of earthquake disasters have happened in Asia. From those earthquakes, comparative surveys about social-spatial succession and mandates were conducted on Turkey Marmara (1999), Taiwan Chi-chi (1999) and Hanshin-Awaji (1995). Spatial aspect of recovery from earthquake disasters has two patterns, the former is transferring recovery. The latter is on devastated site recovery. Though these two patterns were observed each nation, there were contractive activities in both patterns.In Japan, self-help is a principal of recovery. For households owned their houses, on devastated site recovery is a main path, but group removal project for disaster prevention has been done because of risk on devastated site. The other hand, most of households rented houses took transferring recovery pattern. They also rented houses apart from on site.In Turkey, soil conditions were main reason of building loss. Then, building prohibit regulation were executed and apartment or office buildings which built on no damaged suburb area were sold by special prices to damaged house or office owners on condition of only one house or office. On results, rebuilding and repairing damaged buildings was definitely delayed.In Taiwan, cevastated area were around area of moved faults and mountain rural area above epicenter. The principal of recovery is on devastated site recovery. But if there was a severe conditioned settlement where had risk of land slide or existed on strict slope, transferring recovery project had been conducted. The main characteristics of recovery form Chi-chi earthquake Was the role of public-private recovery fund organization that flexibly supported group activities like damaged condominium rebuilding project.]The photos and GIS database which archived recovery actualities was produced experimentally.

最近，亚洲发生了许多地震灾害。在这些地震中，对土耳其马尔马拉(1999年)、台湾集集(1999年)和阪神-阿瓦吉(1995年)进行了关于社会空间演替和授权的比较调查。地震灾害恢复的空间方面有两种模式，前者是转移式恢复。后者正在被摧毁的现场恢复中。虽然每个国家都观察到了这两种模式，但这两种模式都存在收缩活动。在日本，自助是复苏的原则。对于拥有自己房屋的家庭来说，在受灾现场恢复是主要途径，但由于受灾现场的风险，已经进行了防灾的群体性拆迁项目。另一方面，大部分租房家庭采取转让回收模式。他们除了在现场租房外，还租房。在土耳其，土壤条件是建筑物损失的主要原因。然后，执行了禁止建筑的规定，在没有损坏的郊区地区建造的公寓或写字楼，以特价出售给损坏的房屋或写字楼所有者，条件是只有一套房子或办公室。从结果来看，受损建筑的重建和修复肯定会被推迟。在台湾，剥离区位于断层活动区周围和震中以上的山区农村地区。恢复的原则是在被摧毁的现场恢复。但如果有严重的条件性沉降，有滑坡风险，或存在严格的斜坡，则进行了移交恢复工程。集集地震灾后恢复的主要特点是公私恢复基金组织的作用，灵活地支持受损公寓重建项目等群体活动。]实验性地制作了记录恢复现状的照片和地理信息系统数据库。