The Function and Equipping of Central Local Cities

中心地方城市的功能与装备

• 批准号: 10410041
• 负责人: TANAKA Shigeyoshi
• 金额: $ 3.84万
• 依托单位: Hirosaki University
• 依托单位国家: 日本
• 项目类别: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B).
• 财政年份: 1998
• 资助国家: 日本
• 起止时间: 1998 至 2000
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/en/grant/KAKENHI-PROJECT-10410041/
• 关键词: local city; urban function; Equipping of city; individuality; Community Activization; 地域変動; 地域計画; 農村; 地域活性化

The general consensus is that "cities function as central pivotal sites of social life". Utilizing Suzuki Eitaro's "connective facilities" theory and Yazaki Takeo's theory of cities as "integrative facilities", scholars have debated the function cities perform in society and viewed the central local city and its environs in terms of a hierarchical division of functions.However, as the study on Hirosaki City and its surrounding cities and counties has made clear the particular function a central city performs in a region is specific to that region and this specificity must be taken into consideration in ascertaining its function and in the planning of its facilities and services(seibi).Consequently, the provision of services and facilities within regional cities cannot be standar dized across the board and cannot belie the individual situation of each city. Fundamentally, the planning for facilities and services in the central regional city and the building of its base must honor the sense of ownership the surrounding cities and counties feel vis- -vis development in the region. In other words, in the case of Hirosaki, it must proceed forward, first, by being attentive to thedirection in which development in the region has taken thus far and, second, while cognizant of the specificities of the region, complement and build upon what has transpired.The precedent-making study of the three cities, Ichinoseki, Mizusawa, and Esashi, in southern Iwate prefecture has revealed that the policy decisions and given locative, environmental, etc. conditions of each city affected its providing of facilities and services.Each of the above three cities responded in different ways to the societal changes that accompanied the development of the high speed transportion system and these differences resulted from the policy decisions made by each city.

普遍的共识是，“城市是社会生活的中心枢纽”。学者们利用铃木荣太郎的“连接性设施”理论和矢崎武雄的“综合性设施”理论，对城市在社会中的功能进行了讨论，并从功能的层次划分的角度看待中央地方城市及其周边地区。通过对广崎市及其周边县市的研究，明确了一个中心城市在一个区域中所发挥的特殊作用，在确定其功能和规划其设施和服务时，必须考虑到这种特殊性。因此，区域城市内服务和设施的提供不能一刀切，也不能与每个城市的个别情况不符。从根本上说，中心城市的设施和服务规划及其基地建设必须荣誉周边市县维斯该地区发展的主人翁意识。换句话说，在广崎的问题上，首先要关注该地区迄今为止的发展方向，其次要认识到该地区的特殊性，并在此基础上加以补充和发展。对一关、水泽和江藏三个城市的开创性研究，在岩手县南部的研究表明，政策决定和给定的地点，环境，上述三个城市对发展所带来的社会变化的反应各不相同这些差异是由各个城市的政策决定的。