权益分类	功能权益	普通用户	{{item.name}}会员
{{category.name}}	{{benefitItem.name}}

Study on a Practical Forest Use Plan as a Sink measure under Kyoto Protocol

京都议定书下作为汇措施的实用森林利用计划研究

基本信息

批准号：
15405025
负责人：
AMANO Masahiro
金额：
$ 4.61万
依托单位：
Waseda University
依托单位国家：
日本
项目类别：
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)
财政年份：
2003
资助国家：
日本
起止时间：
2003 至 2004
项目状态：
已结题

项目摘要

This report addresses two issues. The first issue compares the approaches of the governmental of Japan, Canada, and the European Union member countries toward using forest carbon sinks to meet their respective Kyoto carbon reduction targets for the first compliance period 2008-2012. This paper examines and compares the approach of the governments of Japan, Canada and the European Union(EU) with respect to carbon sinks for meeting their respective Kyoto Protocol(KP) carbon reduction targets. The study examines various proposed government policies to stimulate the forest sector to achieve carbon sequestration by promoting afforestation, reforestation and deforestation(ARD) and forest management under Articles 3.3 and 3.4 of the KP. It also touches on the establishment of a reporting system for IPCC (UNFCCC) Inventory report under Article 5. In the second issue this report begins a speculation of the prospective ways that biological and forest carbon might be used to sequester carbon beyond the Kyoto compliance period 2008-2012. In the post Kyoto period approaches to addressing carbon sinks will need to be revisited. Three ranges of alternatives are possible. These are the KP system can continue, the system can be simplified, or new modalities can be developed. Also, there is the question of how once register Kyoto forests will be treated in the post Kyoto period. Although COP 9 indicated that once modified the forest would be modified indefinitely. However, it is not clear how binding the provisions of the current KP will be on activity and agreements in the post Kyoto period, which, after all. will almost surely be negotiated de novo. Obvious considerations for a 2^<nd> KP could involve a rethinking of both Articles 3.3 and 3.4.

这份报告涉及两个问题。第一期比较了日本、加拿大和欧盟成员国政府在利用森林碳汇实现各自2008-2012年首个履约期《京都议定书》碳减排目标方面的做法。本文研究和比较了日本、加拿大和欧盟(EU)政府为实现各自的《京都议定书》(KP)碳减排目标而采取的碳汇措施。该研究审查了政府根据《金伯利进程》第3.3条和第3.4条，通过促进植树造林、再造林和毁林以及森林管理来刺激林业部门实现碳封存的各项拟议政策。它还涉及根据第5条建立气专委(《气候公约》)清单报告的报告制度。在第二期报告中，本报告开始推测在2008-2012年《京都议定书》履约期之后，生物碳和森林碳可能被用来固存碳的预期方式。在后京都时期，将需要重新探讨解决碳汇问题的办法。有三种可能的替代方案。这些都是金伯利进程系统可以继续，该系统可以简化，或者可以开发新的模式。此外，还有一个问题是，一旦登记了京都森林，在后京都时期将如何对待。尽管《公约》缔约方会议第九届会议指出，一旦修改，森林将被无限期修改。然而，尚不清楚目前的《京都议定书》的规定对《京都议定书》后时期的活动和协定将有多大的约束力，毕竟这一时期。几乎肯定会从头开始谈判。对《京都议定书》的明显考虑可能涉及对第3.3条和第3.4条的重新考虑。